Table of contents
- Clinical trials overview
- Trials after emergency abdominal surgery
- Trial in chronic hemodialysis
- Trial after oesophagectomy
- Main endpoints and what they mean
- Who the trials are for
Clinical trials overview
The trial data for Serine shows three authorised Phase 3 interventional studies.[1][2][3] These studies are not testing Serine in a general population; they focus on patients with major emergency abdominal surgery, chronic hemodialysis, and oesophagectomy.[1][2][3]
Each study looks at a different nutrition-related question, such as infection risk, muscle protein building, or muscle loss after surgery.[1][2][3] The enrollment sizes range from 20 to 342 participants.[1][2][3]
Trials after emergency abdominal surgery
The first study, Early versus postponed supplementary parenteral nutrition after major emergency abdominal surgery, compares early and delayed supplementary parenteral nutrition.[1] The study includes 342 participants and is authorised as a Phase 3 interventional trial.[1]
The main goal is to see whether early nutrition support can reduce infectious complications during the hospital stay.[1] Infectious complications means infections that happen while the patient is in the hospital after surgery.[1]
The interventions listed are SmofKabiven Perifer and SmofKabiven, both given by infusion as parenteral nutrition.[1] This means the nutrition is given through a vein rather than by mouth.[1]
Trial in chronic hemodialysis
The LOTUS study is a Phase 3 authorised trial in 20 patients with hemodialysis and muscle protein turnover concerns.[2] It studies IDPN, which stands for intradialytic parenteral nutrition, meaning nutrition given during dialysis.[2]
The main endpoint is the difference in myofibrillar fractional synthetic rate during one week of treatment with IDPN versus control.[2] This is a measure of how fast muscle protein is being made, so the study is looking at muscle building in people on dialysis.[2]
The brief summary also says the study will characterize the hemodynamic effects of IDPN.[2] Hemodynamic effects means effects on blood flow and circulation.[2]
Trial after oesophagectomy
The third study is called Route of nutrition and muscle wasting after oesophagectomy and includes 38 participants.[3] It is an authorised Phase 3 interventional trial that studies how the route of nutrition affects cachexia after oesophagectomy.[3]
The intervention listed is SmofKabiven emulsion for infusion, given by parenteral use.[3] The trial is designed to understand whether nutrition route changes muscle wasting, which means loss of muscle size or muscle mass.[3]
The primary outcome is the mean difference in muscle size measured by CT scan from before surgery to 10 days after oesophagostomy, as written in the source data.[3] A CT scan is an imaging test that shows detailed pictures inside the body.[3]
Main endpoints and what they mean
Across these studies, the endpoints focus on recovery after serious illness and surgery.[1][2][3] An endpoint is the main result a trial measures to see whether the treatment is helping.[1][2][3]
In the abdominal surgery trial, the endpoint is the rate of infectious complications during admission.[1]
In the hemodialysis trial, the endpoint is the difference in muscle protein synthesis over one week.[2]
In the oesophagectomy trial, the endpoint is the change in muscle size measured by CT scan after surgery.[3]
Who the trials are for
These studies are aimed at specific patient groups, not healthy volunteers.[1][2][3] One group has major emergency abdominal surgery, one group has chronic hemodialysis with muscle protein turnover concerns, and one group has undergone oesophagectomy.[1][2][3]
Because the studies are Phase 3, they are meant to provide more detailed evidence in real patient care settings.[1][2][3] The source data does not list detailed inclusion or exclusion rules, so the exact entry criteria are not available here.[1][2][3]




