Table of Contents
- What Carbomer 980 is in these trials
- Where Carbomer 980 was used (nasal spray, topical vehicle gel, listed product)
- Common cold: efficacy study of 1146A (Carbomer 980) nasal spray
- Healthy adults: local nasal tolerability and safety study of 1146A
- Pruritus (itch): Carbomer 980 as the vehicle gel in a topical acetaminophen study
- How outcomes were measured (symptom scores and grading scales)
- Safety monitoring: vital signs and laboratory testing
- Turner syndrome trial record: Carbomer 980 listed as a gelling agent product
What Carbomer 980 is in these trials
Carbomer 980 was used as a gel ingredient in trial products, including a nasal spray gel (1146A) and a topical vehicle gel used for comparison in an itch study.[1][2][3]
In a European trial record, carbomer 980 is described as a substance of polymer origin and is listed as a “gelling agent” (meaning it helps form a gel texture).[4]
Where Carbomer 980 was used (nasal spray, topical vehicle gel, listed product)
In common cold research, carbomer 980 was part of a test nasal spray gel product referred to as 1146A (carbomer 980 nasal spray gel).[1][2]
In a pruritus (itch) proof-of-concept study, carbomer 980 was listed as the drug name for the topical vehicle gel, meaning it was the comparison gel base (not the active itch-relief drug).[3]
In a separate European trial record (Turner syndrome), carbomer 980 appears as a medicinal product entry named “CARBOMER 980” with pharmaceutical form “EYE GEL,” and it is also labeled as a “gelling agent,” with route listed as transdermal use in that product entry.[4]
Common cold: efficacy study of 1146A (Carbomer 980) nasal spray
A multi-center study in adults with symptoms of the common cold evaluated whether 1146A nasal spray could reduce symptom severity compared with placebo, and it also evaluated safety.[2]
The study design was randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, and double-blind.[2]
Participants in the carbomer 980 (1146A) group used a nasal spray containing carbomer 980 gel, given as three actuations per nostril per dose, with each actuation 140 microliters (equivalent to 140 mg).[2]
The placebo group used a reference nasal spray vehicle without carbomer 980, also given as three actuations per nostril per dose, with each actuation 140 microliters.[2]
Healthy adults: local nasal tolerability and safety study of 1146A
A single-center study in healthy adults assessed the local nasal tolerability and safety of multiple intranasal administrations of 1146A delivered by a nasal spray applicator.[1]
The study design was randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, with an outcomes assessor masked (meaning the person judging outcomes was kept unaware of group assignment).[1]
In the test group, participants received a nasal spray containing 0.5% carbomer 980, 4 times per day, with 3 actuations per nostril per dose and 140 microliters (140 mg) per actuation.[1]
In the placebo comparator group, participants received a vehicle nasal spray without carbomer 980 on the same schedule and actuation volume.[1]
Pruritus (itch): Carbomer 980 as the vehicle gel in a topical acetaminophen study
A proof-of-concept study in healthy subjects tested topical acetaminophen gels for itch relief and compared them to a vehicle gel.[3]
The study was described as single-blinded, vehicle-controlled, and randomized, with each subject testing three acetaminophen concentrations and one vehicle treatment across two visits (one for histaminergic itch and one for non-histaminergic itch).[3]
In this trial record, the vehicle comparator arm lists “Drug: Carbomer 980,” and the drug listing describes carbomer 980 as the topical vehicle gel (the gel base).[3]
The gels were applied to a predefined 4×4 cm area on the ventral forearm, allowed to absorb for 30 minutes, then residual gel was removed before itch induction and sensory testing in that area.[3]
How outcomes were measured (symptom scores and grading scales)
In the common cold efficacy study, the primary outcome was Average Nasal Symptom Score (ANSS) over days 1–4.[2]
The nasal symptom score was the sum of runny nose, blocked nose, and sneezing, with each symptom self-rated from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe), for a total range of 0–9.[2]
The ANSS for days 1–4 was calculated as the mean of the 4 daily nasal symptom scores across study days 1 to 4, where lower scores mean better nasal symptoms.[2]
Secondary outcomes included ANSS over days 1–7 and Total Symptom Score (TSS) averages over days 1–4 and 1–7.[2]
TSS added nasal symptoms plus headache, muscle ache, chills, sore throat, and cough, each rated 0–3, for a total range of 0–24.[2]
In the nasal tolerability and safety study, the primary outcomes included the incidence of nasal mucosal changes of ≥ Grade 1B from baseline to day 8 using a nasal mucosal grading scale.[1]
The grading scale described Grade 0 as no abnormal findings, Grade 1A as focal irritation (inflammation, erythema, or hyperemia), Grade 1B as superficial erosion, and Grade 2 as moderate erosion.[1]
The study also tracked incidence of moderate or severe mucosal bleeding using a bleeding scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).[1]
Another primary outcome was incidence of moderate or severe crusting of mucosa using a crusting scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).[1]
In the pruritus study, itch intensity was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (no itch) to 10 (most itch imaginable) over 10 minutes after itch induction for histaminergic and non-histaminergic itch conditions.[3]
The primary outcomes compared peak itch intensity between the vehicle gel and the active acetaminophen gel treatments during both non-histaminergic itch induction (cowhage) and histaminergic itch induction.[3]
Safety monitoring: vital signs and laboratory testing
In the healthy adult nasal tolerability study, all adverse events reported by participants were recorded from baseline to day 8.[1]
Vital signs included change from baseline in blood pressure, measured three times after sitting for 5 minutes using an automated validated device, with the mean of the three readings recorded.[1]
Pulse was also measured three times after sitting for 5 minutes, with the mean recorded.[1]
Respiration rate was measured by counting breaths for one minute.[1]
Oral body temperature was measured, with a reference range described as 35.0°C to 37.5°C.[1]
Laboratory monitoring included hematology tests such as hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count (including indices like MCH, MCV, and MCHC), white blood cell count with differential, and platelet count.[1]
Clinical chemistry included electrolytes (sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, phosphorous), substrates (BUN, creatinine, total bilirubin, total protein, albumin, uric acid, and C-reactive protein), and enzymes (AST, ALT, ALP, GGT, and CK).[1]
Virus serology testing included hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B core antibody (IgG + IgM), hepatitis C antibody, and HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies.[1]
Urinalysis included specific gravity, nitrite, protein including microalbuminuria, glucose, ketones, and blood white and red blood cell sediments.[1]
A urine drug and cotinine screen tested for cotinine and substances including barbiturates, benzodiazepines, amphetamines, cocaine, opiates, and cannabis.[1]
Pregnancy testing and fertility assessments used a urine dipstick test in this study’s procedures.[1]
Turner syndrome trial record: Carbomer 980 listed as a gelling agent product
A European trial record about testosterone replacement therapy in women with Turner syndrome lists “CARBOMER 980” as a medicinal product entry described as an eye gel and as a gelling agent, with a stated maximum daily dose amount and maximum treatment period in the record’s product details.[4]
The same record describes primary endpoints focused on changes in body composition measured by DXA scan (including bone mass, fat mass, and lean muscle mass) and other measures like abdominal circumference and weight.[4]
It also lists multiple secondary endpoints, including quality of life, inflammatory markers, sexual function, intramuscular sex hormone levels, blood volume and hemoglobin mass, coagulation parameters, metabolic parameters, neurocognitive function, hypothalamus structure, and fitness-related measures such as VO2-max and muscle strength.[4]



