64CU-PSMA I&T

Clinical trials are studying 64CU-PSMA I&T in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. These trials are looking at how well PET/CT scanning can find spread to pelvic lymph nodes before surgery. The main focus is diagnostic accuracy, especially sensitivity and specificity, in patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk, high-risk, or very high-risk disease.

Table of contents

Trial overview

Two interventional Phase 3 trials studied 64CU-PSMA I&T in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.[1][2] Both trials used PET/CT, which is a combined scan used to look for possible cancer spread in the body.[1][2]

The trials were designed to test the diagnostic performance of the scan, meaning how well it can find disease or show that disease is not present.[1][2] The focus was on pelvic lymph node metastasis, which means cancer spread to lymph nodes in the pelvis.[1][2]

Who was studied

The target group was pre-prostatectomy patients, meaning men being evaluated before prostate surgery.[1][2] The trials specifically included men with unfavorable intermediate-risk, high-risk, or very high-risk prostate cancer.[1][2]

This group was chosen because the trials aimed to check whether the scan could find hidden spread to pelvic lymph nodes before surgery.[1][2]

What the trials measured

The main outcomes were sensitivity and specificity of copper Cu 64 PSMA I&T PET/CT.[1][2] Sensitivity checks how well the scan finds metastatic pelvic lymph nodes when they are truly present.[1][2]

Specificity checks how well the scan shows that pelvic lymph nodes are not involved when they are truly negative.[1][2] These outcomes were compared with histopathology, which is a microscope test of tissue and is used here as the reference standard.[1][2]

Trial status and size

One trial was withdrawn, and the other was completed.[1][2] Each trial planned an enrollment of 323 participants.[1][2]

Both studies used the same phase, condition, and main outcome measures, so they appear to be closely related trial records.[1][2]

How the imaging was judged

A true positive meant the PET scan showed at least one positive pelvic lymph node and histopathology also found a positive lymph node on the same side of the pelvis.[1][2] A true negative meant the scan and histopathology both showed negative pelvic lymph nodes on the same side.[1][2]

This patient-level approach was used to judge whether the scan could reliably detect or rule out lymph node spread before prostate surgery.[1][2]

Ongoing Clinical Trials on 64CU-PSMA I&T

  • Study on the Use of 64Cu-PSMA I&T to Detect Lymph Node Spread in Men with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Before Surgery

    Not yet recruiting

    1 1 1
    Investigated diseases:
    Investigated drugs:
    France Italy Spain
  • Study on the Use of 64Cu-PSMA I&T to Detect Lymph Node Spread in Men with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Before Surgery

    Not recruiting

    1 1 1
    Investigated diseases:
    Investigated drugs:
    France Italy Spain

Glossary

  • Prostate cancer: A cancer that starts in the prostate, a gland in men.
  • Pelvic lymph nodes: Small immune system glands in the pelvis that can be a place where cancer spreads.
  • Metastasis: Spread of cancer from the original place to another part of the body.
  • PET/CT: A scan that combines two imaging methods: PET shows areas of activity, and CT shows detailed body pictures.
  • Histopathology: A lab test that looks at tissue under a microscope to check for cancer.
  • Sensitivity: How well a test finds disease when the disease is really there.
  • Specificity: How well a test shows no disease when the disease is really not there.
  • Pre-prostatectomy: Before prostate surgery.
  • Unfavorable intermediate-risk: A prostate cancer risk group that is more concerning than lower-risk disease.
  • High-risk: A cancer group with a greater chance of spreading or returning.
  • Very high-risk: A cancer group with an even greater chance of serious spread or return.

References

  1. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/2024-512754-16-00
  2. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/2024-512754-16-01