Table of contents
- Trial overview
- Who was studied
- What the trials measured
- Trial status and size
- How the imaging was judged
Trial overview
Two interventional Phase 3 trials studied 64CU-PSMA I&T in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.[1][2] Both trials used PET/CT, which is a combined scan used to look for possible cancer spread in the body.[1][2]
The trials were designed to test the diagnostic performance of the scan, meaning how well it can find disease or show that disease is not present.[1][2] The focus was on pelvic lymph node metastasis, which means cancer spread to lymph nodes in the pelvis.[1][2]
Who was studied
The target group was pre-prostatectomy patients, meaning men being evaluated before prostate surgery.[1][2] The trials specifically included men with unfavorable intermediate-risk, high-risk, or very high-risk prostate cancer.[1][2]
This group was chosen because the trials aimed to check whether the scan could find hidden spread to pelvic lymph nodes before surgery.[1][2]
What the trials measured
The main outcomes were sensitivity and specificity of copper Cu 64 PSMA I&T PET/CT.[1][2] Sensitivity checks how well the scan finds metastatic pelvic lymph nodes when they are truly present.[1][2]
Specificity checks how well the scan shows that pelvic lymph nodes are not involved when they are truly negative.[1][2] These outcomes were compared with histopathology, which is a microscope test of tissue and is used here as the reference standard.[1][2]
Trial status and size
One trial was withdrawn, and the other was completed.[1][2] Each trial planned an enrollment of 323 participants.[1][2]
Both studies used the same phase, condition, and main outcome measures, so they appear to be closely related trial records.[1][2]
How the imaging was judged
A true positive meant the PET scan showed at least one positive pelvic lymph node and histopathology also found a positive lymph node on the same side of the pelvis.[1][2] A true negative meant the scan and histopathology both showed negative pelvic lymph nodes on the same side.[1][2]
This patient-level approach was used to judge whether the scan could reliably detect or rule out lymph node spread before prostate surgery.[1][2]



