Table of contents
- Clinical trials overview
- Pediatric transplant study in acute myeloid leukemia
- Kidney transplant study and graft function
- Multiple sclerosis study in aggressive relapsing remitting disease
- Main endpoints used in these trials
- Who the trials are for
- Trial phases and what they mean
Clinical trials overview
The source data includes three interventional studies that mention Antithymocyte Immunoglobulin as part of the treatment plan or comparison group.[1][2][3] These studies are being done in different diseases: acute myeloid leukemia in children receiving transplantation, kidney transplant rejection prevention, and multiple sclerosis.[1][2][3] All three trials are marked Authorised in the source data.[1][2][3]
Pediatric transplant study in acute myeloid leukemia
One Phase 3 study is titled “Studying Conditioning Regimen In Pediatric Transplantation -AML” and includes children with acute myeloid leukemia.[1] The study is testing whether one conditioning regimen with an alkylator plus two antimetabolites gives better 2-year survival without severe graft-versus-host disease, without chronic non-limited graft-versus-host disease, and without relapse than a regimen with three alkylating agents.[1]
The source data lists Thymoglobuline among the study drugs in this trial, which is a form of Antithymocyte Immunoglobulin named in the trial record.[1] The primary endpoint is a combined measure called GRFS, which means graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival.[1] This endpoint counts whether a patient stays free from severe graft-versus-host disease, chronic non-limited graft-versus-host disease, relapse, or death during follow-up.[1]
Kidney transplant study and graft function
Another study is the BESTOW trial, a Phase 2, multicenter, randomized, open-label study in people undergoing kidney transplantation.[2] The trial is looking at safety and efficacy of tegoprubart and comparing graft function at 12 months after transplant in participants treated with tegoprubart versus tacrolimus-treated participants.[2]
The source data lists Thymoglobuline as one of the study drugs in this trial record, along with other transplant medicines such as Prograf, CellCept, Myfortic, and Prednisolone.[2] The main endpoint is the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate, or eGFR, at 12 months.[2] eGFR is a kidney function test that estimates how well the transplanted kidney is filtering waste from the blood.[2]
Multiple sclerosis study in aggressive relapsing remitting disease
The third study, called RAM-MS, is a Phase 3 prospective randomized trial in people with multiple sclerosis.[3] The study objective is to compare HSCT with a comparator group that includes alemtuzumab, cladribine, or ocrelizumab in patients with aggressive relapsing remitting MS.[3] HSCT means hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, a treatment approach that uses stem cells as part of therapy.[3]
The source data lists Thymoglobuline among the interventions in this trial record, together with Mavenclad, Sendoxan, Ocrevus, and Lemtrada.[3] The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with no evidence of disease activity, or NEDA, after 2 years and 5 years.[3] NEDA means there is no protocol-defined disease activity event during the study period.[3]
Main endpoints used in these trials
The trials use endpoints that measure long-term benefit rather than only short-term changes.[1][2][3] In the transplant study for children with AML, the endpoint combines severe graft-versus-host disease, relapse, and death into one survival measure.[1] In the kidney transplant study, the endpoint is kidney function at 12 months using eGFR.[2] In the multiple sclerosis study, the endpoint is the share of patients who remain free of disease activity at 2 and 5 years.[3]
Who the trials are for
These studies focus on three different patient groups.[1][2][3] One group is children with acute myeloid leukemia who are undergoing transplantation.[1] Another group is people receiving a kidney transplant to prevent rejection of the new kidney.[2] The third group is patients with aggressive relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.[3]
Trial phases and what they mean
The source data includes two Phase 3 trials and one Phase 2 trial.[1][2][3] Phase 2 trials usually look more closely at safety and early signs of benefit, while Phase 3 trials compare treatment strategies in larger groups of patients.[2][1][3] The listed enrollment sizes are 135 for the pediatric AML study, 192 for the kidney transplant study, and 100 for the multiple sclerosis study.[1][2][3]




