Table of Contents
- Trial overview
- COPD studies
- Asthma studies
- Participants and comparators
- Outcomes measured
- Trial status and size
Trial overview
The trials listed here are studying Vilanterol in Phase 3 research, which is a late stage of testing in larger groups of patients.[1][2][3][4][5] The studies are interventional, meaning researchers give a treatment and compare results between groups.[1][2][3][4][5]
Across these trials, the main conditions are chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma.[1][2][3][4][5] One study also includes COPD with heart failure and reduced ventricular ejection fraction, which means the heart is pumping less strongly than normal.[3]
COPD studies
One completed trial, the ANTES B+ study, compared triple therapy with LABA-LAMA combination treatment in high-risk GOLD B COPD patients.[1] Its goal was to see whether more patients could stay clinically controlled at all study visits over 12 months.[1] The study enrolled 1,028 people, making it the largest trial in this set.[1]
The TRACkER trial also studied COPD in a primary care population, but it focused on a different question: whether triple therapy improved health status more than LABA/LAMA treatment in symptomatic, inhaled-corticosteroid-naive patients with asthma-like features and blood eosinophils of at least 100 cells per microliter.[5] A blood eosinophil count is a lab test that measures a type of white blood cell and can help describe inflammation patterns.[5]
The authorised study on dual bronchodilation with umeclidinium/vilanterol looked at COPD patients who also had heart failure with an ejection fraction between 35% and 50%.[3] It aimed to see whether treatment improved stroke volume during exercise, which is the amount of blood the heart pumps with each beat.[3]
Asthma studies
One withdrawn Phase 3 trial studied adult participants with asthma and compared fluticasone furoate and Vilanterol inhalation powder 100 mcg/25 mcg with BREO ELLIPTA 100 mcg/25 mcg and placebo.[2] The study aimed to show therapeutic equivalence between the generic product and the branded product, and also to show superiority over placebo.[2]
The SECURE study also involved asthma, but it focused on symptom control and treatment adherence, which means how well people follow the treatment plan.[4] It compared different device-based treatment groups and measured asthma control after 6 months using the ACT score, a questionnaire for asthma control.[4]
Participants and comparators
These trials mainly include adults, but each study targets a specific patient group.[1][2][3][4][5] Some studies focus on COPD patients with high risk or additional heart disease, while others focus on adults with asthma.[1][2][3][4][5]
The comparison treatments include placebo, LABA-LAMA combinations, triple therapy, and other inhaled products.[1][2][3][5] In the asthma equivalence study, the trial compared a Vilanterol-containing inhalation powder with BREO ELLIPTA and placebo.[2]
Outcomes measured
The main outcomes in these studies include clinical control, health status, lung function, and exercise-related measures.[1][2][3][5] Clinical control was measured as being controlled at all study visits in one COPD trial, and as a change in the Clinical COPD Questionnaire in another.[1][5]
The asthma bioequivalence study used FEV1, which is the amount of air a person can blow out in one second, including a 24-hour measure called AUC0-24h and a morning pre-dose measure after 4 weeks.[2] The COPD and heart failure study used exercise Doppler-echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise testing to measure heart and breathing response during exercise.[3]
Trial status and size
The trial statuses are mixed: three studies are completed, one is authorised, and one was withdrawn.[1][2][3][4][5] Enrollment ranges from 60 participants in the smallest study to 1,430 in the largest, showing that the research questions vary from focused clinical testing to larger comparative studies.[2][3][1]






