Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous

Clinical trials investigating Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous are studying bowel preparation and related digestive procedures in different patient groups. These studies look at outcomes such as cleansing quality, diagnostic performance, safety, and patient acceptance. The trials include people having colonoscopy, capsule endoscopy, Crohn’s disease tests, and other digestive or related conditions.

Table of contents

Trial overview

The trial data provided here include studies that use Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous in bowel preparation and digestive research settings.[1] The main focus is not on the substance itself, but on how well the preparation works for tests such as colonoscopy, capsule endoscopy, and other digestive procedures.[1]

Several studies compare one preparation with another, while others test how a preparation affects the quality of a medical exam or a clinical outcome.[1][2] The studies are spread across different patient groups and different disease areas.[1][3]

Who is being studied

The target populations are varied. Some trials include people scheduled for elective colonoscopy or colorectal cancer screening, while others include patients with Crohn’s disease, fecal incontinence, hip fracture, recurrent urinary tract infections, axial spondyloarthritis, or major poisoning in intensive care.[1][2][3]

One study focuses on patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, which means liver cancer that cannot be removed by surgery.[4] Another study looks at patients undergoing small bowel capsule endoscopy, and one study evaluates people after intra-rectal botulinum toxin injections for fecal incontinence.[5][6]

What the trials measure

The most common main outcome is bowel cleansing quality, which means how clean the bowel is before or during the test.[1][7] In the capsule endoscopy study, the primary outcome is the degree of small bowel cleansing using an accepted cleansing scale.[1]

In the colonoscopy studies, researchers measure whether cleansing is adequate, often using the BBPS score, which is a standard bowel cleanliness score.[2] In the colorectal cancer screening trial, the main outcome is the adenoma detection rate, meaning the proportion of patients in whom at least one adenoma is found.[7]

Other studies measure different clinical outcomes. For example, one trial measures the time to onset of high amplitude propagative contractions after laxative instillation, and another measures the proportion of patients needing rescue medication after 72 hours after hip surgery.[2][3] The hepatocellular carcinoma study measures both safety, through serious adverse events, and efficacy, through disease control rate at 12 weeks.[4]

The Crohn’s disease ultrasound study measures whether the terminal ileum lumen fills evenly with contrast and whether the bowel wall can be clearly separated from the lumen.[5] The recurrent urinary tract infection study measures the rate of new infection episodes within 180 days after treatment.[6]

Trial phases and study size

Most of the studies are Phase 2 or Phase 3 trials.[1][2][3] Phase 2 trials usually explore whether a strategy works in a smaller group, while Phase 3 trials are larger and compare approaches more fully.

One study is listed as a low-intervention trial, which means the research approach is lighter than a standard intervention study.[1] Enrollment ranges from very small studies, such as 15 or 21 participants, to large studies with 818 participants.[2][4][7]

Key study types and settings

  • Bowel preparation studies are the largest group. These studies look at how well a preparation cleans the bowel before colonoscopy or capsule endoscopy, and whether the cleansing is good enough for the doctor to see the lining clearly.[1][7]

  • Digestive motility research is also included. In the fecal incontinence study, researchers look at bowel movement patterns after rectal treatment and use manometry, a test that measures pressure and muscle activity in the bowel.[2]

  • Disease-specific research appears in Crohn’s disease, axial spondyloarthritis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. These studies use bowel-related preparation or microbiota-related treatment as part of a wider clinical question.[4][5][8]

  • Supportive care studies are also included, such as the hip surgery trial and the intensive care poisoning study, where the goal is to improve bowel management or reduce absorption of toxic substances.[3][9]

Patient-friendly terms

Adenoma detection rate means how often a colonoscopy finds a polyp-like growth that can matter for cancer screening.[7] Recue medication in the hip surgery study means extra treatment needed if the main plan does not work well enough.[3]

RECIST 1.1 is a standard way to judge whether cancer is shrinking, staying stable, or growing.[4] Disease control in that study means complete response, partial response, or stable disease.[4]

High amplitude propagative contractions are strong bowel contractions that move stool forward.[2] Terminal ileum is the last part of the small bowel, and it is a key area in Crohn’s disease imaging.[5]

Trial ID Phase Condition studied Status Enrollment
2025-520671-38-00 Low Intervention Comparison of diagnostic tools Authorised 156
NCT05998187 Phase 3 Fecal incontinence Authorised 21
2024-513871-42-00 Phase 3 Hip fracture Authorised 375
2025-521451-23-00 Phase 3 Elective colonoscopy preparation Completed 520
2023-510504-45-00 Phase 2 Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma Authorised 15
2023-508500-38-00 Phase 2 Crohn’s disease Authorised 104
2024-518739-12-00 Phase 2 Major poisoning in intensive care Authorised 200
2025-520452-28-00 Phase 2 Recurrent urinary tract infections Authorised 24
NCT05654753 Phase 2 Axial spondyloarthritis Authorised 25
2025-523748-11-00 Phase 3 Colorectal cancer early detection Authorised 818

Ongoing Clinical Trials on Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous

  • Study on Preventing Constipation After Hip Fracture Surgery Using Bisacodyl and a Drug Combination for Post-Surgery Patients

    Recruiting

    3 1 1 1
    Investigated diseases:
    Denmark
  • A study comparing the effectiveness of a simeticone drug combination and a sodium picosulfate drug combination for bowel preparation in patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening.

    Recruiting

    3 1 1 1
    Investigated diseases:
    Spain
  • Study on Using Ultrasound with Perflubutane and Laxative for Detecting Crohn’s Disease in Patients

    Recruiting

    2 1 1 1
    Norway
  • Study on Fecal Microbiota Transfer for Preventing Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Premenopausal Women Using Intestifix

    Recruiting

    2 1 1
    Investigated diseases:
    Germany
  • Study on the Effects of Botulinum Toxin Type A and a Drug Combination on Rectal Function in Patients with Fecal Incontinence

    Recruiting

    3 1 1 1
    France
  • Study of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation combined with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with unresectable liver cancer who progressed after initial treatment

    Recruiting

    2 1 1 1
    Investigated diseases:
    Italy
  • Study on Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis Resistant to Conventional Treatment

    Recruiting

    2 1 1
    Investigated diseases:
    France
  • Study on Reduction of Toxicant Levels in Blood through Combined Digestive Decontamination with Activated Charcoal and Intestinal Purge for Intubated Patients with Major Poisoning in Intensive Care

    Not yet recruiting

    2 1 1 1
    France
  • Study on Improving Small Bowel Visualization in Capsule Endoscopy for Patients Using Ascorbic Acid, Sodium Ascorbate, Potassium Chloride, and Simeticone

    Not yet recruiting

    3 1 1 1
    Spain
  • Efficacy and Safety of Mannitol Compared to Plenvu for Bowel Preparation in Patients Undergoing Elective Colonoscopy

    Not recruiting

    3 1 1 1
    Investigated diseases:
    Belgium Italy Poland Spain Sweden

Glossary

  • Bowel cleansing: Cleaning out the bowel before a test so the doctor can see the lining more clearly.
  • Capsule endoscopy: A test where a small camera capsule is swallowed to take pictures inside the small bowel.
  • Colonoscopy: A test that looks inside the large bowel using a flexible camera tube.
  • Mucosa: The inner lining of the bowel or other organs.
  • Diagnostic performance: How well a test can find disease or other problems.
  • Phase 2: A study stage that looks more closely at whether a treatment works and how safe it is in a smaller group.
  • Phase 3: A larger study stage that compares treatments more fully to confirm benefit and safety.
  • Enrollment: The number of people planned or included in a trial.
  • Primary outcome: The main result a study is designed to measure.
  • RECIST 1.1: A standard way to measure how cancer responds to treatment.
  • Disease control rate: The share of patients whose disease gets better or stays stable.
  • ASAS 20 improvement criteria: A set of rules used to measure improvement in axial spondyloarthritis.

References

  1. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/2025-520671-38-00
  2. https://clinicaltrials.eu/trial/study-on-the-effects-of-botulinum-toxin-type-a-and-a-drug-combination-on-rectal-function-in-patients-with-fecal-incontinence/
  3. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/2024-513871-42-00
  4. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/2023-510504-45-00
  5. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/2023-508500-38-00
  6. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/2025-520452-28-00
  7. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/2025-523748-11-00
  8. https://clinicaltrials.eu/trial/study-on-fecal-microbiota-transplantation-for-patients-with-axial-spondyloarthritis-resistant-to-conventional-treatment/
  9. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/2024-518739-12-00