Table of Contents
- Clinical trials overview
- Acute agitation in emergency psychiatry
- Agitated behavior in dementia
- Status epilepticus after cardiac arrest
- Healthy volunteer pharmacodynamic study
- Main outcomes and what they mean
Clinical trials overview
These trials study Lorazepam in different patient groups and one healthy volunteer group.[1][2][3][4] The studies include Phase 1, Phase 3, and Phase 4 research, so they cover early testing, larger treatment studies, and studies in routine care settings.[1][2][3][4]
The trials are interventional, which means participants receive a study treatment or comparison treatment rather than only being observed.[1][2][3][4] Across the studies, Lorazepam is compared with placebo or with other active medicines, depending on the research question.[1][2][3][4]
Acute agitation in emergency psychiatry
One Phase 4 trial studies adults with acute agitation in emergency psychiatry and includes 132 participants.[1] The study compares a single oral dose of Lorazepam with single-dose sublingual dexmedetomidine and buccal midazolam for acute tranquillization, which means rapid calming of severe agitation.[1]
The main outcome is the change in PANSS Excited Component (PEC) score 60 minutes after dosing.[1] PANSS is a symptom scale, and the excited component measures agitation-related symptoms, so this trial is focused on how quickly and how well the treatment reduces agitation.[1]
Agitated behavior in dementia
Another Phase 3 study looks at people with dementia and agitated behavior that did not respond to guideline-recommended interventions.[2] This trial plans to enroll 100 participants and uses an N-of-1 approach, which means treatment effects are studied in a personalized way for each patient over time.[2]
In this study, Lorazepam is one of the psychotropic drugs being tested against placebo, alongside quetiapine and olanzapine.[2] The main outcome is agitation over time measured with the Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI).[2] CMAI is a questionnaire-style scale used to track how often agitated behaviors happen.[2]
Status epilepticus after cardiac arrest
The TELSTAR-2 trial is a Phase 3 multicenter randomized study in comatose patients after cardiac arrest who have status epilepticus on continuous EEG, and it plans to enroll 150 participants.[3] Continuous EEG means ongoing brain-wave monitoring, and randomized means participants are assigned to treatment groups by chance.[3]
In this trial, Lorazepam is one of several anti-seizure treatments being studied, including propofol, diazepam, esketamine, valproate, levetiracetam, lacosamide, and midazolam.[3] The study asks whether stepwise seizure suppression improves outcome compared with no anti-seizure treatment.[3]
The main outcome is functional recovery at six months after cardiac arrest, measured with the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (eGOS) by telephone interview.[3] eGOS is a scale that describes how well a person has recovered after a serious brain injury or illness.[3]
Healthy volunteer pharmacodynamic study
One Phase 1 study is in healthy male participants and includes 24 volunteers.[4] This trial compares Lorazepam with placebo and also compares brexanolone with placebo, using transcranial magnetic stimulation, or TMS, to look at central nervous system pharmacodynamic activity.[4]
Pharmacodynamic activity means the effect of a treatment on the body or brain, and TMS uses magnetic pulses to help measure brain and muscle responses.[4] The primary outcome is the change from baseline in TMS motor evoked potential amplitude, which is a measure of the brain’s response in a muscle test.[4]
Main outcomes and what they mean
The trials use different endpoints because they are studying different questions.[1][2][3][4] In agitation studies, the focus is on symptom scores such as PEC and CMAI, which show whether behavior improves after treatment.[1][2]
In the cardiac arrest study, the outcome is long-term recovery, which is more important than short-term seizure control alone.[3] In the healthy volunteer study, the outcome is a laboratory-style brain response measure, which helps researchers compare the biological effect of treatments in a controlled setting.[4]
References
[1] NCT 2023-510201-18-00. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/2023-510201-18-00
[2] NCT 2024-510601-29-00. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/2024-510601-29-00
[3] NCT NCT06549426. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06549426
[4] NCT 2022-503019-40-00. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/2022-503019-40-00




