ROPINIROLE

Clinical trials are investigating ROPINIROLE in healthy volunteers to see how a single oral dose affects metacognition and resting-state brain connectivity. The study aims to measure whether ROPINIROLE changes self-monitoring of performance, confidence, and related brain network activity.

Table of Contents

Trial overview

The available trial data describe one interventional study of ROPINIROLE in healthy volunteers.[1] The study is designed to test whether a single oral dose changes metacognition and resting-state functional brain connectivity.[1]

The trial title and summary show that the main focus is not a disease treatment study, but a mechanistic study of how ROPINIROLE may affect self-monitoring and brain network activity in people without a known illness.[1]

Who can take part

The target population is healthy adults, described in the trial as healthy volunteers.[1] The study does not list a disease group, so it is aimed at understanding the drug’s effect in people without the condition being studied.[1]

The enrollment goal is 20 participants, which means this is a small study.[1] Small studies like this are often used to explore a question before larger studies are done.[1]

Study design and treatment

This is an interventional trial, meaning the researchers give a study treatment and then measure the effect.[1] The intervention includes placebo and ROPINIROLE 1 mg given by mouth as a single dose.[1]

Placebo is a look-alike treatment with no active study drug, and it is used to compare results fairly.[1] The trial compares ROPINIROLE with placebo to see whether the drug changes confidence, accuracy, and brain connectivity.[1]

What the study measures

The primary endpoint is the within-participant change in metacognitive efficiency, also called the M-ratio, under ROPINIROLE versus placebo.[1] This is measured from confidence ratings during cognitive testing and uses a signal-detection-theoretic framework, which helps separate self-judgment from task performance.[1]

The study uses a modified version of the Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test, which is a memory task that asks people to learn and recall words.[1] Researchers use trial-by-trial accuracy and confidence ratings to see whether confidence matches actual performance.[1]

The summary also says the study will look at metacognitive bias, meaning the gap between confidence and actual performance, and Goodman–Kruskal Gamma correlation, which shows how well confidence separates correct answers from errors.[1] The brief summary states that the researchers want to know whether ROPINIROLE changes confidence without changing basic cognitive performance.[1]

Trial phase and status

The trial is listed as Phase 4 and has the status Authorised.[1] In the trial record, Phase 4 is linked with a product that already has marketing authorization and has been shown to be safe in humans.[1]

Even though the product is already authorised, this study is still important because it asks a new research question about brain function and self-evaluation in healthy people.[1]

Why this research matters

The trial summary explains that the researchers want to understand how dopaminergic stimulation may affect insight into one’s own performance.[1] In simple terms, they are studying whether ROPINIROLE can make people more or less overconfident about their answers.[1]

The study is also meant to help explain brain systems involved in self-awareness and unawareness of neurological disturbances, which is sometimes called anosognosia.[1] The data suggest that findings from healthy volunteers may help guide future research on people who have problems with insight into their condition.[1]

Trial ID Phase Condition studied Status Enrollment
2025-520800-81-00 Phase 4 Healthy volunteers; metacognition and resting-state functional brain connectivity Authorised 20

Ongoing Clinical Trials on ROPINIROLE

  • A Study Testing How Ropinirole Affects Self-Assessment of Thinking Performance and Brain Activity in Healthy Volunteers

    Not yet recruiting

    1 1 1
    Investigated drugs:
    Italy

Glossary

  • Healthy volunteers: People without the condition being studied who join a trial so researchers can see how a treatment affects the body or the brain in a controlled setting.
  • Metacognition: A person’s ability to think about and judge their own thinking and performance. In this trial, it means how well people know whether their answers are right or wrong.
  • Metacognitive efficiency: A measure of how well confidence matches actual performance. A higher score means a person’s confidence is more accurate.
  • M-ratio: A specific way to measure metacognitive efficiency. It compares metacognitive performance with task performance.
  • Confidence ratings: Scores that show how sure a person is about an answer. These ratings help researchers study self-confidence and self-monitoring.
  • Resting-state functional brain connectivity: A way to study how brain regions communicate when a person is resting and not doing a task.
  • Interventional study: A trial where researchers give a treatment, such as a drug or placebo, and then measure what happens.
  • Placebo: A look-alike treatment with no active study drug. It helps researchers compare the real effect of the study treatment.
  • Phase 4: A later stage of clinical research done after a product already has marketing authorization. It often looks at how a treatment performs in a study setting.
  • Signal-detection-theoretic framework: A research method that helps separate how well someone performs on a task from how well they judge their own performance.

References

  1. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/2025-520800-81-00