Table of contents
- Trial overview
- Who participated
- Trial phases and study design
- What the trials measured
- Key studies in the data
- What these results may mean for patients
Trial overview
The available studies of Vrdn-001 are all about thyroid eye disease (TED), a condition that affects the eyes and can cause bulging and inflammation.[1] The trial data show that researchers studied Vrdn-001 in people with TED of any duration, people with chronic TED, and in one study, normal healthy volunteers as well as TED patients.[1][2]
All four trials in the source data were interventional studies, which means the researchers gave a treatment and then compared outcomes.[1][2][3][4] The studies were completed, and they focused on safety, tolerability, and how well Vrdn-001 worked for TED.[1][3][4]
Who participated
Most participants were people with TED, including those with chronic thyroid eye disease and those with TED of any duration.[1][3] One study also included normal healthy volunteers, meaning people without the disease who took part to help researchers learn more about the treatment in a controlled way.[2]
One open-label study was designed for people who were non-responders in earlier pivotal studies, meaning they did not meet the study response goal after the earlier treatment period.[4] That study gave these participants another chance to receive Vrdn-001 and let researchers assess safety and efficacy again.[4]
Trial phases and study design
The source data include Phase 3 and Phase 4 trials.[1][2][3][4] Phase 3 studies are usually larger studies that help confirm whether a treatment works and is safe enough for wider use.[1][3][4] Phase 4 studies are done later and can add more information about real-world use and safety.[2]
Several studies compared Vrdn-001 with placebo, which is a treatment without the active study drug.[2][3] The open-label study was different because participants knew they were receiving the study treatment, which is what open-label means.[4]
The trial schedules in the data often used five intravenous infusions, meaning the treatment was given through a vein several times over the study period.[1][3][4] One study also described a dose range of 3.0 to 20.0 mg/kg, while other studies used 10 mg/kg.[2][1][3][4]
What the trials measured
The main safety measures were adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), which are unwanted medical problems that happen during a study.[1][2][3][4] The studies also tracked any clinically important changes in other safety checks.[2][3][4]
Several efficacy outcomes focused on proptosis, which means eye bulging.[2][3][4] A common response goal was a reduction of at least 2 mm in the study eye without a similar worsening in the other eye, measured with an exophthalmometer, a tool used to measure how far the eye sticks out.[2][3][4]
Some studies also measured Clinical Activity Score (CAS), which shows how active the disease is by looking at signs of inflammation.[2][3][4] In the source data, response was often checked 3 weeks after the fifth infusion, which was Week 15.[1][2][3][4]
Key studies in the data
NCT06384547 was a Phase 3 study in 297 people with TED of any duration.[1] It was designed to confirm the safety and tolerability of Vrdn-001 given as five IV infusions of 10 mg/kg every three weeks, and its main outcome was the rate of treatment-emergent adverse events through Week 15.[1]
NCT06021054 was a Phase 3 study in 290 people with chronic TED.[3] It compared Vrdn-001 with placebo and measured an overall response rate based on both proptosis response and clinical activity response at 3 weeks after the fifth infusion, while also tracking safety events.[3]
NCT05176639 was a Phase 4 study in 157 participants, including normal healthy volunteers and people with TED.[2] This study looked at safety, tolerability, efficacy, and also pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, which describe how the body handles the treatment and how the treatment affects the body.[2]
2023-507350-33-00 was an open-label Phase 3 study in 147 people who had not responded in earlier pivotal studies.[4] It provided access to Vrdn-001 again and measured overall response rate and safety outcomes at Week 15.[4]
What these results may mean for patients
These studies show that Vrdn-001 was tested in several groups of people with TED, including those with long-lasting disease and those who had not improved in earlier trials.[1][3][4] The research focused not only on whether the treatment could help eye bulging and disease activity, but also on whether it could be given safely.[1][2][3][4]
Because the trials used clear response measures, such as changes in proptosis and CAS, they were designed to show whether Vrdn-001 made a meaningful difference for people with TED.[2][3][4] The completed studies give a structured picture of how the treatment was tested in later-stage clinical research.[1][2][3][4]



