Table of contents
- Clinical trials overview
- WHIM syndrome study
- Chronic neutropenia study
- What the trials measure
- Who may participate
- Study design and phases
Clinical trials overview
These studies are testing Mavorixafor in people with blood disorders that cause low neutrophil counts and repeated infections.[1][2] The trial data show two Phase 3 interventional studies, one completed and one authorised.[1][2]
In clinical research, interventional means the study gives a treatment and then measures what happens.[1][2] Both studies compare Mavorixafor with placebo in at least part of the trial, which helps researchers see whether the study drug performs better than no active drug.[1][2]
WHIM syndrome study
NCT03995108 studied people with WHIM Syndrome, a rare condition marked by warts, low antibody levels, infections, and myelokathexis.[1] The study was completed and enrolled 14 participants.[1]
This trial had a randomized placebo-controlled period and an open-label period.[1] Randomized means participants are assigned by chance, and placebo-controlled means some people received a look-alike treatment without active drug for comparison.[1] Open-label means both the researchers and participants know the treatment being given.[1]
The main goal was to show that Mavorixafor could raise circulating neutrophils compared with placebo and reach a clinically meaningful threshold.[1] A key outcome was the time above threshold-absolute neutrophil count, or TAT-ANC, meaning how long the neutrophil count stayed at or above 500 cells/μL over 24 hours.[1]
The open-label part focused on long-term safety and tolerability.[1] Safety was checked through adverse events, laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, physical exams, and eye exams.[1]
Chronic neutropenia study
NCT06056297 is studying Mavorixafor in participants with congenital and acquired primary autoimmune and idiopathic chronic neutropenic disorders who have recurrent and/or serious infections.[2] The trial is authorised, is Phase 3, and plans to enroll 214 participants.[2]
This study also includes a placebo capsule comparison.[2] The trial is looking at people with chronic neutropenia who are not receiving chronic G-CSF treatment, as well as the overall population regardless of background therapy.[2] G-CSF is a treatment used to help the body make more neutrophils.[2]
The main outcome is the annualized infection rate based on infections reviewed by a BIAC, which is a committee that checks and confirms infection events in the study.[2] The study also measures ANC responders, meaning participants who meet a target neutrophil response in at least 3 of 6 planned visits during the 52-week treatment period.[2]
For some participants, a positive ANC response means an ANC of at least 1500 cells/μL.[2] For participants whose starting ANC is below 500 cells/μL, a response can also mean at least a 2-fold increase from baseline, which means the count doubles from the starting level.[2]
What the trials measure
Across these studies, the main focus is on neutrophil counts, infections, and safety.[1][2] Neutrophils are a type of white blood cell that help fight infection, so low counts can leave people at higher risk.[1][2]
Neutrophil improvement: The WHIM syndrome study measured how long ANC stayed above a set threshold, while the neutropenia study measured how many participants reached a defined ANC response.[1][2]
Infection control: The chronic neutropenia study tracked the annualized infection rate, which is the number of infections over a year adjusted for study time.[2]
Safety and tolerability: The WHIM syndrome study followed adverse events, lab tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical and eye exams to see how well people handled treatment.[1]
Who may participate
The WHIM syndrome study included participants with WHIM syndrome.[1] The chronic neutropenia study includes participants with congenital or acquired primary autoimmune and idiopathic chronic neutropenic disorders who are having recurrent and/or serious infections.[2]
These studies are not for the general public; they are for people who meet the trial rules, sometimes called eligibility criteria.[1][2] The available data also show that one study focused on people not receiving chronic G-CSF treatment.[2]
Study design and phases
Both trials are Phase 3 studies, which usually means the treatment has already been studied in earlier research and is now being tested in larger groups.[1][2] Phase 3 trials are important because they help show whether a treatment works in real patient groups and how safe it is over time.[1][2]
The WHIM syndrome study used a randomized placebo-controlled period followed by an open-label period.[1] The chronic neutropenia study is also interventional and uses placebo capsules for comparison.[2] Together, these designs help researchers compare outcomes fairly and collect longer-term data on treatment response.[1][2]



