Table of Contents
- Trials overview
- Conditions and patient groups
- Trial phases and study designs
- Outcomes measured in the trials
- Key study details
- What patients should know from these trials
Trials overview
The trial data show that Macrogol 3350 appears in studies about bowel preparation, constipation-related care, and some other clinical research settings.[1][2][4]
Several studies use Macrogol 3350-based products as part of a plan to clean the bowel before tests such as colonoscopy or capsule endoscopy.[3][4][9][10][11]
Conditions and patient groups
The studies include different patient groups, not just one disease.[1][2][5][7]
People with recurrent urinary tract infections, meaning repeated urine infections, in a phase II study looking at fecal microbiota transfer and related preparation steps.[1]
Patients with axial spondyloarthritis, a type of inflammatory disease that affects the spine and nearby joints, in a phase II fecal microbiota transplantation trial.[2]
People having small bowel capsule endoscopy, a test where a small camera capsule looks at the small intestine, in a study of bowel cleansing quality.[3]
Patients needing bowel preparation before colonoscopy, an exam of the large bowel with a camera tube, in phase III comparison studies.[4][10]
Critically ill children with constipation, meaning difficult or infrequent bowel movements, in a phase III prevention study.[5]
Patients with fecal incontinence, meaning loss of bowel control, in a phase III motility study.[6]
Patients with advanced cancer who are starting opioids for pain, in a low-intervention study focused on constipation prevention.[7]
People with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, a liver cancer that cannot be removed by surgery, in a phase II study of fecal microbiota transfer added to cancer treatment.[8]
Patients with Crohn’s disease, a long-term inflammatory bowel disease, in a phase II imaging study.[9]
Children and teenagers with colonic disease, meaning disease of the large bowel, in a phase III cleansing study before colonoscopy.[11]
Trial phases and study designs
Most of the studies are interventional, which means the researchers assign a treatment or preparation and then measure the results.[1][2][4]
The source data include Phase 2 studies, Phase 3 studies, and one low-intervention study.[1][2][4][5][7]
Phase 2 studies are used to explore whether a strategy seems effective and to learn more about the outcome in a smaller group of patients.[1][2][8][9]
Phase 3 studies compare strategies in larger groups and look for stronger proof that one approach works better or is not worse than another.[4][5][6][10][11]
Low intervention means the study uses routine products or standard care and focuses on outcomes with less added study burden.[3][7]
Outcomes measured in the trials
The main outcomes differ by study, but most of them focus on how well the bowel is cleaned, how symptoms change, or whether the treatment helps the disease-related goal.[3][4][5][7]
New UTI episodes within 180 days after treatment are measured in the recurrent UTI study, using symptom and urine culture criteria.[1]
MSP variation and the proportion of patients meeting ASAS 20 improvement criteria are measured in the axial spondyloarthritis study; these are trial-specific ways to track change in disease activity.[2]
Small bowel cleansing quality is measured with an accepted cleansing scale in the capsule endoscopy study.[3]
Adequate bowel preparation is measured with the BBPS, using a total score of at least 6 and at least 2 points per bowel segment in the colonoscopy preparation study.[4]
Stool output is the main endpoint in the critically ill child constipation study.[5]
Time to onset of high amplitude propagative contractions, which are strong bowel muscle waves, is measured in the fecal incontinence study before and after botulinum toxin injections.[6]
Constipation is measured using the Bowel Function Index, with a score below 30 used as the study definition in advanced cancer.[7]
Disease control rate and adverse events of grade greater than 3 are measured in the hepatocellular carcinoma study, so the researchers can assess both benefit and safety.[8]
Homogenous contrast filling of the terminal ileum, meaning even filling of the last part of the small bowel, is the main outcome in the Crohn’s disease ultrasound study.[9]
Tolerability and efficacy are compared in the colonoscopy cleansing studies, including non-inferiority testing, which asks whether one treatment is not worse than the other by a set margin.[10][11]
Key study details
Some trials use Macrogol 3350 directly as part of the study intervention, while others list related bowel-cleansing products in the same research program.[4][5][7]
The enrollment sizes range from small studies with 15 or 21 participants to larger studies with 400 participants, which shows that the research includes both focused early testing and bigger comparison studies.[6][8][10]
The recurrent UTI study is a phase II trial with 24 planned participants and aims to study prevention of new infection episodes after treatment.[1]
The axial spondyloarthritis study is a phase II trial with 25 participants and looks at both microbiota correction and clinical improvement.[2]
The capsule endoscopy study is a low-intervention study with 156 participants and compares preparation protocols for better visualization of the small bowel.[3]
The colonoscopy preparation study in adults is a phase III trial with 188 participants and tests whether the Macrogol 3350 and electrolytes combination gives adequate bowel cleansing.[4]
The critically ill child study is a phase III trial with 233 participants and tests whether prophylactic treatment can prevent constipation.[5]
The fecal incontinence study is a phase III trial with 21 participants and measures changes in bowel motility after injections.[6]
The advanced cancer study is a low-intervention trial with 250 participants and compares constipation prevention strategies during opioid treatment.[7]
The hepatocellular carcinoma study is a phase II trial with 15 participants and evaluates safety plus disease control after fecal microbiota transfer added to cancer therapy.[8]
The Crohn’s disease study is a phase II trial with 104 participants and uses ultrasound to study the small bowel after ingestion of the study preparation.[9]
The colonoscopy comparison study in adults is a phase III trial with 400 participants and compares two bowel cleansing agents for efficacy and tolerability.[10]
The pediatric colon disease study is a phase III trial with 241 participants and measures bowel cleansing success in children and teenagers.[11]
What patients should know from these trials
From the trial data, Macrogol 3350 is being studied mainly as part of bowel cleansing plans and related bowel care research, rather than as a stand-alone topic.[3][4][5][10][11]
The research aims are practical: better bowel cleaning, better symptom control, and clearer understanding of which preparation works best for which patient group.[1][2][7][8]
Because the studies involve different conditions and different ages, the exact participation rules and study goals depend on the specific trial.[1][5][11]


