Table of Contents
- Overview of the trial program
- Who the study includes
- Study phase and purpose
- What the trials measure
- Study design and comparison groups
- Key trial details
Overview of the trial program
The source data describes one interventional study of GSKVX000000039711 in the setting of influenza vaccine research.[1] The study was designed to find and confirm the dose and to assess safety, reactogenicity, and immune response.[1]
The trial was completed and enrolled 1,272 participants.[1]
Who the study includes
The study focused on healthy younger and older adults.[1] This means the trial did not target people with influenza illness, but rather healthy volunteers taking part in a prevention study.[1]
The condition listed in the source data is prevention of influenza infection.[1] In simple terms, the study aimed to see whether the vaccine approach could help prepare the immune system against flu.[1]
Study phase and purpose
This study was in Phase 1/2.[1] Phase 1/2 means early clinical research that usually starts with careful safety checks and then looks at whether the body makes an immune response.[1]
The brief summary says the study aimed to evaluate the safety and reactogenicity profile of the investigational study intervention and to evaluate the humoral immune response induced by it.[1] Humoral immune response means the response made by antibodies in the blood.[1]
What the trials measure
The main outcomes include local reactions at the injection site and whole-body reactions from Day 1 to Day 7.[1] These are the kinds of early side effects or reactions that are often watched soon after vaccination.[1]
The study also measures unsolicited adverse events from Day 1 to Day 28, serious adverse events from Day 1 to Day 183, adverse events of special interest from Day 1 to Day 183, and medically attended events from Day 1 to Day 183.[1] These terms cover side effects, more serious health problems, special safety concerns, and any event that leads to medical care.[1]
For Phase 1 only, the study checks whether lab results move from a non-clinically significant value at Day 1 to a clinically significant abnormal value at Day 8 and/or Day 29 for hematology and clinical chemistry.[1] Hematology means blood tests, and clinical chemistry means tests that look at substances in the blood, such as those that reflect organ function.[1]
The immune response outcomes include geometric mean titer of antigen 1 and antigen 2 antibody levels at Day 29, geometric mean increase from Day 1 to Day 29, seroconversion rate, and the percentage of participants with antibody levels at or above a cut-off value.[1] These measures help show whether the vaccine makes the body produce more antibodies and how strong that response is.[1]
Study design and comparison groups
The study is listed as interventional, which means participants received a study intervention rather than only being observed.[1] The intervention list includes GSKVX000000039711 and several other study codes, along with comparison vaccines such as Alpharix-Tetra and EFLUELDA.[1]
The source data shows that the study used intramuscular administration, which means the product was given into a muscle.[1] The exact comparison structure is not fully explained in the source, but the presence of multiple vaccine groups suggests the study compared different study formulations and reference vaccines.[1]
Key trial details
NCT05823974 is the trial identifier for this study.[1] The trial was completed and included healthy younger and older adults in a flu prevention setting.[1]
In practical terms, the study was built to answer two main questions: is the vaccine approach safe enough to study further, and does it trigger the immune system in a useful way?[1] The measured outcomes show that researchers were also watching for both short-term and longer-term safety signals.[1]



