Ascorbic Acid

Clinical trials investigating Ascorbic Acid are studying how it performs in different patient groups, including people with severe burns, cardiac arrest shock, cardiac surgery, colorectal cancer, renal stress, and obesity. These studies mainly look at safety, tolerability, and whether Ascorbic Acid helps improve clinical outcomes.

Table of Contents

Trial overview

These trials study Ascorbic Acid in different clinical settings, including severe burns, cardiac arrest shock, cardiac surgery, colorectal cancer, renal oxidative stress in type 2 diabetes, and obesity or overweight. The main goals are to see whether Ascorbic Acid is safe, whether it is tolerated, and whether it can improve important health outcomes in these groups.[1][2][3][4][5][6]

The studies are not all the same. Some test Ascorbic Acid alone, while others study it together with other treatments or standard care.[1][4][5]

Patient groups studied

The trials include several different patient groups. One study is in severely burned patients, another in patients with post-cardiac arrest shock, and another in cardiac surgery patients in intensive care.[4][5][1]

Other studies include people with pMMR/MSS colon cancer, which means a type of colorectal cancer defined by tumor testing, people with type 2 diabetes, and people living with overweight or obesity.[3][6][2]

Trial phases and study design

Most of the Ascorbic Acid studies in the source data are Phase 2 trials, which usually look for early signs of benefit and continue safety testing in a smaller group of patients.[1][3][4][5][6]

One study is a Phase 3 trial in type 2 diabetes, which is a larger study designed to compare outcomes more formally. The obesity study is a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-ascending-dose study, which means patients are assigned to treatment groups by chance, one side does not know all group assignments, and the dose is increased step by step across groups.[2][6]

Main endpoints measured

The main results vary by trial, but many focus on safety and tolerability. These include adverse events, serious adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiogram results, and clinical laboratory tests.[6][1]

Some studies measure disease-specific outcomes. For example, the burn study looks at persistent organ dysfunction and death at 28 days, the cardiac arrest study looks at weaning from vasopressors by day 3, the cardiac surgery study looks at the area under the curve of IL-6, and the colorectal cancer study looks at pathological response rate.[4][5][1][3]

Other studies measure body weight change, weight loss of at least 5%, renal perfusion after vitamin C infusion, and how the body handles the study treatment over time through pharmacokinetic measures such as AUC, Cmax, and half-life.[6][2][1]

Key trial details

  • Cardiac surgery study: This Phase 2 trial in 60 patients tests Ascorbic Acid in people having open-heart surgery or treated in intensive care. The main endpoint is the area under the curve of serum IL-6 from baseline to 72 hours after surgery, which measures the level of inflammation over time.[1]

  • Cardiac arrest shock study: This Phase 2 study includes 234 patients and looks at early intravenous high-dose Ascorbic Acid after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with shock. The main endpoint is the cumulative incidence of weaning from vasopressors at day 3, meaning how many patients no longer need medicines that support blood pressure.[5]

  • Colorectal cancer pilot study: This Phase 2 trial includes 24 patients with pMMR/MSS colon cancer. It studies Ascorbic Acid together with Ipilimumab and Nivolumab before surgery, and the main endpoint is pathological response rate, which checks how the tumor tissue responds after treatment.[3]

  • Burn injury study: This Phase 2 multicenter randomized trial includes 373 severely burned patients. It studies intravenous Ascorbic Acid added to standard care, and the main endpoint is persistent organ dysfunction and death at 28 days, a combined measure of survival and organ support needs.[4]

  • Renal oxidative stress study: This Phase 3 trial in 75 people with type 2 diabetes looks at renal vascular oxidative stress, using vitamin C infusion as part of the assessment. The primary endpoint is the impact of finerenone on renal perfusion after vitamin C infusion compared with placebo.[2]

  • Obesity and overweight study: This Phase 2 trial includes 360 participants with obesity or overweight and studies subcutaneous AZD9550 and AZD6234, with Ascorbic Acid not listed as the study drug in the source data. It is included here only because the user source set contains mixed trial records, but it is not an Ascorbic Acid trial and should not be counted as one.[6]

What these trials mean for patients

For patients, these studies show that Ascorbic Acid is being tested in serious hospital conditions and in cancer and metabolic disease settings. The trials are trying to find out if Ascorbic Acid can improve recovery, reduce inflammation, help with organ support, or improve treatment response, while also checking safety carefully.[1][3][4][5][2]

Because the studies are different in purpose and design, participation depends on the condition being studied and the trial rules for that specific study. The source data show that some trials are completed and others are still authorised.[1][2][3][4][5]

Trial ID Phase Condition studied Status Enrollment
2023-510561-10-00 Phase 2 Cardiovascular illness, ICU, open-heart surgery Authorised 60
2022-500717-64-00 Phase 2 Cardiac arrest Authorised 234
2022-502524-41-00 Phase 2 pMMR/MSS, Colon Cancer Authorised 24
NCT04138394 Phase 2 Severely burned patients Completed 373
2023-508266-15-00 Phase 3 Type 2 diabetes mellitus Completed 75
NCT06862791 Phase 2 Overweight and obesity Authorised 360

Ongoing Clinical Trials on Ascorbic Acid

  • A study comparing macrogol 3350 combination and sodium picosulfate for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy in children and teenagers with colonic disease

    Recruiting

    1 1 1 1
    Belgium Germany Hungary Italy The Netherlands Poland +2
  • Study on Fecal Microbiota Transfer for Preventing Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Premenopausal Women Using Intestifix

    Recruiting

    1 1
    Germany
  • Study on the Effects of Botulinum Toxin Type A and a Drug Combination on Rectal Function in Patients with Fecal Incontinence

    Recruiting

    1 1 1 1
    France
  • Study on the Early Use of Levosimendan Compared to Placebo for Patients with Cardiogenic Shock

    Recruiting

    1 1 1
    Investigated diseases:
    France
  • Study of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation combined with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with unresectable liver cancer who progressed after initial treatment

    Recruiting

    1 1 1
    Investigated diseases:
    Italy
  • Study Comparing Bowel Cleansing Agents Plenvu and Picoprep for Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy to Exclude Colorectal Cancer

    Recruiting

    1 1 1 1
    Investigated diseases:
    Denmark
  • Study on Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis Resistant to Conventional Treatment

    Recruiting

    1 1
    Investigated diseases:
    France
  • Study on the Effects of Levosimendan for Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Being Weaned from ECMO

    Recruiting

    1 1
    Investigated diseases:
    Austria
  • Study on Treating Anemia After Cesarean with Ferric Carboxymaltose or Oral Iron in Women with Moderate Iron Deficiency Anemia

    Recruiting

    1 1 1 1
    France
  • Study on the Effectiveness of High-Dose Vitamin C for Patients with Shock After Cardiac Arrest

    Recruiting

    1 1 1
    Investigated diseases:
    France

Glossary

  • Phase 2: A study stage that looks for early signs that a treatment may help and checks safety in a smaller group of people.
  • Phase 3: A larger study stage that compares treatments more closely and helps confirm benefit and safety.
  • Randomized: Participants are assigned by chance to different study groups, which helps make the comparison fair.
  • Placebo: A look-alike treatment with no active study drug. It is used to compare results fairly.
  • Safety: How well a treatment is tolerated and whether it causes unwanted problems.
  • Tolerability: How manageable the treatment is for patients, including whether it can be given without major difficulty.
  • Pharmacokinetics: How the body absorbs, moves, and removes a treatment over time.
  • Pharmacodynamics: What the treatment does in the body and what effect it has on the disease or body functions.
  • Primary endpoint: The main result a trial is designed to measure.
  • Inflammatory marker: A blood test or measure that shows inflammation in the body.
  • Composite endpoint: A result that combines more than one important outcome into one study measure.

References

  1. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/2023-510561-10-00
  2. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/2023-508266-15-00
  3. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/2022-502524-41-00
  4. https://clinicaltrials.eu/trial/study-on-the-effects-of-high-dose-vitamin-c-in-patients-with-severe-burns/
  5. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/2022-500717-64-00
  6. https://clinicaltrials.eu/trial/study-on-weight-loss-for-patients-with-obesity-or-overweight-using-azd9550-and-azd6234-combination/