Skip to content
Clinical Trials – home

Amikacin Clinical Trials: Studies in Lung Infections, Sepsis, and Pediatric Infections

7 / 9
trials open to patients / all trials
12+
Countries

In short

Clinical trials investigating Amikacin are studying how it may help in different infections, including lung infections, sepsis, and serious bacterial disease in children. These trials mainly look at safety, effectiveness, and patient outcomes in specific groups such as adults with mycobacterial lung infection, ICU patients, and pediatric patients with severe infections.

Key points

  • Clinical trials investigating Amikacin are focused on serious infections, especially lung infections caused by mycobacteria, ventilator-related airway infection, sepsis, and some severe bacterial infections in children. Most studies are Phase 2 or Phase 3, with one Phase IV trial also listed. The target populations include adults with newly diagnosed lung disease, critically ill ICU patients, and pediatric patients with serious infections or cancer-related fever and low white blood cell counts. The main results being measured include symptom improvement, sputum conversion, survival, progression to worse infection, and safety. Some trials compare Amikacin with placebo or with other treatment plans, while others study it as part of a broader antibiotic strategy.

Trial overview

The trial data show Amikacin being studied in different infection settings, not as a general medicine article but as part of clinical research programs. The studies include people with mycobacterial lung infections, ventilator-related airway infection, sepsis, and serious bacterial infections in children.

Most of the trials are interventional studies, which means researchers assign a treatment or compare treatment groups. The trial goals are mainly to test effectiveness, safety, and treatment outcomes in specific patient groups.

Studies in lung infections

Several trials focus on mycobacterial lung infection, which means lung disease caused by certain slow-growing bacteria. One large Phase 3 study looked at adults newly diagnosed with nontuberculous mycobacterial lung infection caused by Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and compared Amikacin Liposome Inhalation Suspension plus background treatment with an empty liposome control plus the same background treatment.

That study measured the change in respiratory symptom score from the start of the trial to Month 13, so it was focused on how patients felt over time. The study was completed and included 783 participants.

Another Phase 2 trial studied Mycobacterium abscessus pulmonary disease and included several treatment options, including Amikacin by inhalation and by intravenous use. Its main outcome was microbiological clearance, meaning the germ could no longer be found in sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage samples, together with good tolerance of the treatment.

A Phase 3 trial in Mycobacterium xenopi pulmonary infection studied ARIKAYCE liposomal added to standard treatment and compared it with standard treatment alone. The main result was the 3-month sputum conversion rate, which checks whether the lung sample becomes negative for the germ.

Studies in ICU infection and sepsis

Amikacin is also being studied in critically ill patients with ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis, a breathing-tube related airway infection seen in intensive care. This Phase 3 trial compared a 5-day course of inhaled Amikacin with placebo and looked at whether treatment reduced progression from ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis to ventilator-associated pneumonia by Day 28.

Another Phase 3 study included Amikacin among many antibiotic options in patients with sepsis in the ICU. The main endpoint was 30-day mortality, which means whether patients were alive 30 days after treatment assignment.

These trials show that Amikacin is being tested in severe hospital infections where fast treatment choices matter.

Studies in children and adolescents

One Phase 2 trial studied children and adolescents 9 months to younger than 18 years with serious gram-negative bacterial infections, including bloodstream infection, complicated urinary tract infection, complicated intra-abdominal infection, hospital-acquired pneumonia, and ventilator-associated pneumonia. In this study, Amikacin was one of the treatment options compared with best available therapy.

The study looked at pharmacokinetics, which means how the body handles the medicine over time, and also safety and tolerability. The planned enrollment was 54 participants.

A separate Phase 3 study in pediatric cancer patients with febrile neutropenia tested whether antibiotics could be stopped early in children who were improving and had low infection markers. Amikacin was one of the antibiotics listed in the treatment options for this study. The main outcome was uncomplicated resolution at 28 days, meaning no death, no ICU admission, no sepsis, and no proven bacterial infection.

Trial phases and study size

The listed Amikacin trials are mainly Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies, showing that the drug is being tested in both mid-stage and larger confirmatory research.

One Phase IV study is also listed, but it does not specifically include Amikacin in its intervention list. The enrollment sizes vary widely, from 54 participants in a pediatric study to 783 participants in the MAC lung infection study.

These sizes matter because larger studies can better show whether a treatment works across many patients, while smaller studies are often used to learn more about safety or dosing behavior.

Outcomes measured in the trials

The main outcomes vary by disease but usually focus on either improvement in infection or safety.

  • Respiratory symptom score in the MAC lung infection study measured how symptoms changed over 13 months.
  • Sputum conversion in the Mycobacterium xenopi study measured whether the lung samples became negative after 3 months.
  • Progression to pneumonia in the ICU airway infection study measured whether ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis became ventilator-associated pneumonia by Day 28.
  • Mortality in the sepsis study measured whether patients survived 30 days.
  • Microbiological clearance and tolerance in the Mycobacterium abscessus study measured whether the germ was cleared and whether the treatment was tolerated.
  • Uncomplicated resolution in the pediatric febrile neutropenia study measured recovery without major complications at 28 days.

Together, these endpoints show that the research on Amikacin is aimed at practical patient outcomes: symptom relief, infection control, survival, and safety.

Questions people often ask

Conditions where Amikacin is being studied

Each condition opens its own overview and trial list

Trials with Amikacin

Recruiting trials first

See all 9 →
Quick filters
  • Participants:Adults
  • Participants:Adults
Clinical Trials Concierge

Prefer not to search? Our Concierge searches the trials for you.

Tell us about your condition – we search every trial in Europe and connect you with the right site.

Legal notice · Published by CTIN POLAND sp. z o.o., ul. rtm. Witolda Pileckiego 67/109, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland · KRS 0001111334 · REGON 528919042 · NIP 9512598637

© 2026 Clinical Trials EU – European Clinical Trials Information Network

GDPR compliance, ISO 9001 and ISO 27001 certified (LL-C Certification)

On this site, “treatment” means an investigational medicine being studied in a clinical trial. Its safety and efficacy for the use being studied have not yet been confirmed, some participants may receive a placebo or a comparator medicine, and taking part does not guarantee any health benefit. The decision to take part is made by the doctor at the research site. This site is for information only and does not replace medical advice.

This service is not affiliated with the European Commission, the EMA, or the official CTIS system. Most information comes from publicly available international clinical-trial registries, supplemented by data from academic sites, national regulators and commercial sponsors. On this site, “treatment” and “therapy” mean a medicine being tested in a clinical trial. Its safety and effectiveness in the use being studied are not yet confirmed, some participants may receive a placebo or a comparator, and taking part does not guarantee a health benefit. The doctor at the research site decides who can take part. This site provides information, not medical advice. Certain content and visual elements on this website have been generated or enhanced using artificial intelligence (AI).