A parapneumonic pleural infection, also called pleural empyema, is a buildup of infected fluid in the thin membrane that surrounds the lungs. When antibiotics and a chest tube to drain the fluid are not enough, two different ways to clear the infection are being compared. One approach uses a minimally invasive surgery known as VATS, which allows doctors to look inside the chest and clean the area through small cuts. The other approach uses medicines that are placed directly into the chest space; one of these is alteplase, an enzyme that helps dissolve clots, and the other is dornase alfa, a substance that breaks down thick mucus.
The purpose of the study is to determine which of these treatments leads to a shorter stay in the hospital for patients whose infection does not improve with the initial antibiotics and drainage. After a patient is enrolled, they receive either the surgical procedure or the medication combination, stay in the hospital while doctors watch for improvement, and are then followed for about a month to see how quickly they can leave the hospital and return to normal activities.
During the follow‑up, information is collected on how long the chest tube remains, any need for additional procedures, pain levels, ability to perform daily tasks, and overall quality of life. The study also looks at the costs related to health care and any loss of work time, helping to understand the broader impact of each treatment option.



The Netherlands