This study is looking at Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, which is a long-lasting condition that causes joint inflammation, pain, and swelling in children and young people. The study focuses on patients whose disease has not responded well enough to an earlier treatment with a type of medicine called TNFi. The study will compare different medications to see which works better when the first TNFi treatment has not been successful. The medications being tested include abatacept, tocilizumab, tofacitinib, adalimumab, and etanercept. Some of these medications are given as injections under the skin, while tofacitinib can be taken by mouth as tablets or liquid solution. The study will compare three types of non-TNFi medications with a second TNFi medication to see which approach is more effective at controlling the disease.
The purpose of the study is to find out which treatment is better at helping children with this type of arthritis reach a state of minimal disease activity after six months, meaning their symptoms are much improved and under better control. The study will look at whether children taking one of the three non-TNFi medications do better than those taking a second TNFi medication. The study will also measure how the different treatments affect pain, tiredness, and the ability to move around, as well as overall disease activity.
Children taking part in the study will be assigned to receive one of the four treatment approaches and will continue treatment for twelve months. During this time, they will have regular check-ups to see how well the medication is working and to monitor for any side effects. The study will measure disease activity at six months and again at twelve months to see how well each treatment controls the arthritis over time. Children in the study must be at least two years old but under eighteen years old, weigh at least ten kilograms, and have active arthritis despite having tried a TNFi medication for at least three months.



Germany
Italy
The Netherlands