Xxb750

Clinical trials are investigating Xxb750 in people with heart failure. The study looks at whether different doses can improve a heart failure blood marker and help define the best dose. It focuses on symptomatic patients with left ventricular ejection fraction below 50% who are already on standard treatment.

Table of Contents

Trial overview

The main trial in the source data was a Phase 2 study of Xxb750 in patients with heart failure.[1]

It was described as a proof-of-concept and dose-finding study, which means it was designed to see whether the treatment may work and to help choose the best dose for future research.[1]

The trial was completed and enrolled 740 people.[1]

Who was studied

The study focused on people with symptomatic heart failure, meaning they had heart failure with noticeable symptoms.[1]

It included patients with left ventricular ejection fraction below 50%, which means the left side of the heart was pumping below a normal level.[1]

Participants were already receiving standard of care, including an ACEI, an ARB, or sacubitril/valsartan.[1]

What the study tested

The study compared three target dose levels of Xxb750 with placebo.[1]

A placebo is a look-alike treatment that does not contain the active study medicine and is used to make the comparison fair.[1]

The source data also lists several background heart medicines used in the study setting, including lisinopril, candesartan, valsartan, losartan, and others in the ACEI and ARB classes, along with valsartan and sacubitril.[1]

Main endpoint

The main outcome was the change in log NT-proBNP from baseline to Week 16.[1]

NT-proBNP is a blood marker that can help show how active or severe heart failure is.[1]

“Baseline” means the start of the study, and Week 16 means the measurement was checked after 16 weeks of treatment.[1]

Trial design and treatment groups

This was an interventional trial, which means researchers gave study treatment and followed the results.[1]

The intervention list shows Xxb750 given by subcutaneous injection and compared with placebo, with the study using target dose levels to explore dose response.[1]

Dose response means checking whether different doses lead to different effects.[1]

What the results were meant to show

The study was built to evaluate whether Xxb750 could reduce NT-proBNP more than placebo in symptomatic heart failure patients.[1]

It was also meant to show whether one of the tested doses looked better than the others, which can help guide later trials.[1]

Because only one completed trial was provided, the source data mainly describes the study goal, patient group, phase, and endpoint rather than final results.[1]

Trial IDPhaseCondition studiedStatusEnrollment
2023-504678-39-00Phase 2Heart FailureCompleted740

Ongoing Clinical Trials on Xxb750

  • Study of XXB750 and Drug Combination for Patients with Heart Failure

    Not recruiting

    2 1 1
    Bulgaria Czechia Denmark France Germany Hungary +5

Glossary

  • Heart failure: A long-term condition where the heart cannot pump blood as well as the body needs.
  • Symptomatic: Having signs or symptoms that can be felt or noticed, such as shortness of breath or tiredness.
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): A measure of how much blood the left side of the heart pumps out with each beat.
  • LVEF below 50%: A lower-than-normal heart pumping measure used in this study to select patients.
  • Standard of care: The usual treatment doctors already use for a condition.
  • ACEI: Short for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, a type of heart medicine listed in the study background treatment.
  • ARB: Short for angiotensin receptor blocker, another type of heart medicine listed in the study background treatment.
  • Sacubitril/valsartan: A combination heart medicine used as part of standard treatment in the study.
  • NT-proBNP: A blood marker that can rise when heart failure is worse.
  • Placebo: A treatment without active study medicine, used for comparison.
  • Dose-finding study: A study that helps researchers learn which dose may work best.

References

  1. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/2023-504678-39-00