Table of contents
- Clinical trial overview
- Breast cancer studies
- Other cancers studied
- Trial phases and what they mean
- Main endpoints used in the trials
- Who may join these studies
- Treatment combinations and comparisons
Clinical trial overview
The trial data show that Abemaciclib is being studied in many cancer settings, with the largest group of studies in breast cancer.[1][2] Most trials are interventional studies, which means people are assigned to a treatment plan so researchers can compare results.[1]
These studies are mostly authorised, and they include both early-stage and advanced disease.[1][2] Some trials also include special groups such as older adults, men, women, children, and young adults.[6][13][13]
Breast cancer studies
Many trials focus on hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer, which is a common breast cancer type studied with hormone-based treatment.[1][2] Some studies are in the adjuvant setting, meaning treatment after surgery to lower the risk of the cancer coming back.[1]
For example, NCT03155997 studies endocrine therapy with or without Abemaciclib after surgery in people with high-risk, node-positive, early-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer, and its main endpoint is invasive disease-free survival.[1] NCT04565054 also studies Abemaciclib with standard adjuvant endocrine therapy in intermediate to high-risk early breast cancer, with invasive disease-free survival since randomization as the main outcome.[2]
Several studies look at advanced or metastatic breast cancer, which means cancer that has spread or cannot be removed by surgery.[3][5][7] These trials often compare Abemaciclib combinations with other treatments, such as fulvestrant, letrozole, or other CDK4/6 inhibitors.[3][5][7]
Some breast cancer trials are more specific. NCT05696626 studies women and men with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer with an ESR1 mutation, which is a change in a gene that may affect treatment response, and measures progression-free survival.[3] NCT06365788 studies Abemaciclib plus bicalutamide in androgen receptor-positive triple-negative breast cancer, and its main endpoint is disease control rate at 16 weeks.[9]
There are also studies in special breast cancer groups such as older patients, brain metastases, and rare ovarian tumors with estrogen receptor positivity.[8][13][17] NCT05386108 studies elacestrant with Abemaciclib in people with brain metastases from ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, and it first checks the recommended Phase 2 dose before measuring objective response rate.[17]
Other cancers studied
Abemaciclib is also being studied outside breast cancer.[4][10][12][15] NCT05288166 studies Abemaciclib with abiraterone plus prednisone in men with high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, and the main endpoint is radiographic progression-free survival.[4]
NCT05440786 studies Abemaciclib with irinotecan and temozolomide in people with Ewing’s sarcoma, and the main endpoint is progression-free survival by blinded independent review.[15] NCT02152631 studied Abemaciclib in previously treated KRAS-mutated lung cancer, with overall survival as the main outcome.[12]
Other trials include high-grade glioma after radiotherapy, low-grade serous ovarian cancer, adult-type granulosa cell tumor, and rare epithelial ovarian tumors.[10][11][14] These studies show that researchers are testing whether Abemaciclib may help in different tumor types, not only breast cancer.[10][11][14]
Trial phases and what they mean
The studies range from Phase 1 to Phase 4, and some are low-intervention or phase 1/2 studies.[1][6][7][12][15][18]
Phase 1 studies mainly focus on safety, tolerability, dose-limiting toxicities, and finding a recommended dose.[7][12][17] For example, NCT05386108 and 2025-521128-31-00 both include safety and dose-finding parts.[7][12]
Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies usually test whether Abemaciclib improves cancer control compared with another treatment or a control group.[1][2][3][4][5]
One Phase 4 study in prostate cancer looks at whether Abemaciclib can be added safely and whether it improves radiographic progression-free survival in a later-stage research setting.[18]
Main endpoints used in the trials
The most common endpoint is progression-free survival, which means the time before the cancer gets worse or the patient dies.[3][4][5][8][15] Many trials use this endpoint because it helps show whether a treatment delays cancer growth.[3][5]
Other important endpoints include invasive disease-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate, and disease control rate.[1][12][14][16] Some studies also measure ctDNA change, Ki67 change, residual cancer burden, or time to treatment failure.[10][13][16][13]
Safety is also a major part of several trials, especially Phase 1 studies, where researchers track adverse events, serious adverse events, lab results, ECG results, and dose-limiting toxicities.[7][16][13]
Who may join these studies
Eligibility depends on the cancer type and the stage of disease.[1][3][4] Some trials include people after surgery with early breast cancer, while others include people with locally advanced, unresectable, metastatic, or recurrent disease.[1][3][10]
Some studies are limited to specific groups, such as postmenopausal women, pre- and postmenopausal women and men, older patients, children and young adults, or men with prostate cancer.[3][4][6][10][12]
Several trials also require prior treatment history, such as having already received endocrine therapy, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, or chemotherapy, depending on the study question.[3][5][7][9]
Treatment combinations and comparisons
Abemaciclib is often studied in combination with endocrine therapy, which is hormone-based treatment used in hormone receptor-positive cancer.[1][2][5][8]
It is also tested with other medicines such as fulvestrant, letrozole, tamoxifen, abiraterone, prednisone, bicalutamide, temozolomide, irinotecan, elacestrant, giredestrant, capivasertib, and ARV-471.[3][4][7][9][11][14][15][17]
Some studies compare Abemaciclib combinations with another CDK4/6 inhibitor, a placebo, or standard treatment, so researchers can see whether the Abemaciclib arm works better or has a different safety profile.[2][5][6][18]


