All participants receive the standard chemotherapy drugs fludarabine, cytarabine and the antibody‑drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin. Some children also take venetoclax, while others receive the chemotherapy alone. Treatment is given in several cycles over a few months, and children are monitored regularly with doctor visits and simple tests to check blood counts and overall health.

The main outcome being watched is how long the children survive after starting the study, a measure known as overall survival, which simply counts the time from the start of treatment until death from any cause. Follow‑up continues for several years to capture this information.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate how safe the recommended dose of Cangrelor is for children from birth up to 18 years of age who are undergoing these heart procedures. Participants will receive the medication while the procedure is being performed and will stay in the hospital for a short period after the infusion to allow doctors to observe any immediate effects.

During the follow‑up period, medical staff will watch for signs of bleeding, breathing difficulties such as wheezing or shortness of breath, and changes in vital signs (heart rate and blood pressure). Simple blood and urine tests will be done to check the blood’s ability to clot, kidney function, and overall health. Any need for blood product transfusions or unusual drops in urine output will also be recorded, and any side effects will be closely monitored.

Participants are randomly assigned to receive either Ataciguat or a matching placebo for approximately 48 weeks, and neither the participants nor the study staff know which treatment is given. Regular visits include measurement of valve size with an echocardiogram (an ultrasound picture of the heart), assessment of exercise performance using a CPET that records the peak VO2 (the maximum amount of oxygen the body can use during intense activity), and a non‑contrast CT scan to evaluate calcium buildup. The study also tracks the timing of any need for valve replacement procedures such as TAVR/SAVR or death, allowing comparison of changes in valve area and exercise ability between the two groups over the study period.

The purpose of the trial is to determine whether MK-8748 is at least as effective as aflibercept in preserving or improving vision. Participants will receive a series of injections into the eye over the course of about one year, with regular visits for eye checks, vision testing, and imaging that may involve the fluorescein dye.

Vision is measured using best-corrected visual acuity, which is the sharpest vision possible with the best glasses or contacts, and the results are recorded as letters on an ETDRS chart, a standard eye‑test chart. Throughout the study, doctors will monitor participants for any side effects or safety concerns.

The purpose of the study is to assess how effective and safe sonelokimab is for adults with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa. Participants in the study will receive either sonelokimab or a placebo over a period of 16 weeks. During this time, researchers will monitor the participants to see if there is a 75% improvement in their condition, which is measured by a specific score called the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) score. The study will also track any side effects or adverse events that occur during the treatment period.

Throughout the study, participants will undergo regular check-ups, including physical examinations and laboratory tests, to ensure their safety and to gather data on the treatment’s effects. The trial aims to provide valuable information on whether sonelokimab can be a beneficial treatment option for those suffering from hidradenitis suppurativa, potentially improving their quality of life by reducing the severity of their symptoms.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate how well AVP-786 works in reducing agitation symptoms in patients with Alzheimer’s-related dementia. Participants in the study will receive either the AVP-786 capsules or a placebo, and neither the participants nor the researchers will know which treatment each participant is receiving. This is known as a double-blind study. The study will take place over a period of time, during which participants will be monitored for changes in their symptoms and any side effects they may experience.

Throughout the study, participants will be asked to take the medication orally, in capsule form, and will be regularly assessed by healthcare professionals. The study aims to provide valuable information on whether AVP-786 can be a beneficial treatment option for managing agitation in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. The results will help determine if this medication can improve the quality of life for those affected by this condition.

The purpose of the study is to see how well Nemtabrutinib works compared to the other two treatments in people who have not yet received treatment for their CLL or SLL. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either Nemtabrutinib or one of the other two medications chosen by the study doctor. The study will last for a period of up to 108 weeks, during which participants will take the medication daily and attend regular check-ups to monitor their health and the progress of the disease.

Throughout the study, doctors will assess how the disease responds to the treatment and how long participants remain free from disease progression. They will also monitor overall survival and any side effects experienced by participants. The study aims to provide valuable information on the effectiveness and safety of Nemtabrutinib compared to the current standard treatments for CLL and SLL.

The study is divided into two phases. In the first phase, participants will receive either PLS240 or a placebo to compare the effects. This phase is designed to see if PLS240 can effectively lower PTH levels by at least 30%. In the second phase, which is open-label, all participants will receive PLS240 to further assess its long-term safety. Participants will receive the medication through an intravenous injection, which means it will be administered directly into a vein using a pre-filled syringe.

The trial will last for a maximum of 53 weeks, during which participants will have regular check-ups to monitor their health and the effects of the treatment. These check-ups will include laboratory tests, physical exams, and monitoring of vital signs. The goal is to ensure the treatment is both effective and safe for individuals with secondary hyperparathyroidism undergoing hemodialysis.

Participants in the study will be randomly assigned to receive either Upadacitinib or a placebo, which is a substance with no active medication. The study is designed to be double-blind, meaning neither the participants nor the researchers will know who is receiving the actual medication or the placebo. This helps ensure that the results are not influenced by expectations. The study will last for a period of time, during which participants will take the medication orally in the form of a modified-release tablet. The goal is to observe any changes in the severity of eczema symptoms and overall skin condition over the course of the study.

Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for any improvements in their eczema symptoms, such as reduced itching and inflammation, as well as any potential side effects. The study aims to provide valuable information on whether Upadacitinib can be an effective treatment option for those suffering from moderate to severe eczema. By participating in this study, researchers hope to gain insights that could lead to better management and treatment options for individuals with this challenging skin condition.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate how effective and safe this treatment is for patients with Uveitic Macular Edema. Participants in the study will receive either the actual medication or a placebo. The study will monitor changes in vision and eye health over time, with particular attention to improvements in visual clarity and reductions in retinal swelling. The study will also assess the safety of the treatment by tracking any side effects that may occur.

Throughout the study, participants will have regular check-ups to measure their vision and eye condition. The study will last for a period of up to 52 weeks, during which the effects of the treatment will be closely observed. The goal is to determine if the treatment can significantly improve vision and reduce swelling in the retina for those affected by this condition.

Participants in the study will receive either secukinumab or a placebo. The study will last for 24 weeks, during which the effects of the treatment on shoulder symptoms will be monitored. The main focus will be on changes in physical symptoms related to the shoulder, assessed at different points throughout the study. Participants will be asked to continue any existing treatments, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and physiotherapy, at a stable dosage and regimen.

The study will also involve monitoring the safety and tolerability of secukinumab, including any side effects or changes in laboratory results. Participants will have their progress evaluated through various assessments, including the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). The study aims to provide valuable insights into the potential benefits of secukinumab for individuals with rotator cuff tendinopathy.

The purpose of the trial is to show that the test tablet is bioequivalent to the reference tablet, meaning it provides the same amount of drug in the bloodstream. Participants will fast, meaning they will not eat for several hours, before taking one tablet; after a short break to let the first dose clear from the body, they will take the other tablet, with simple check‑ins at each visit.

Safety will be monitored by recording any unwanted effects, checking vital signs such as blood pressure and heart rate, performing laboratory tests, and conducting an ECG (a quick, painless test that records the heart’s electrical activity).

In this study, progesterone is given at a specific time in the cycle. After treatment, the study follows what happens over the next part of the cycle and around the time of egg collection. The study also looks at hormone levels in the blood, including E2 (a form of estrogen), P4 (progesterone), LH (luteinizing hormone), and FSH (follicle-stimulating hormone), which are natural body signals that help control ovulation and egg development.

The purpose of the study is to confirm whether MV140 is safe and helpful in reducing repeated urinary tract infections. The trial lasts about 15 months after treatment begins. Over this time, participants are followed for new infection episodes, and study visits are used to check symptoms and general health. The study also looks at side effects and how the treatment affects daily life.

The vaccine used in the study contains inactive forms of common bacteria that can cause urinary tract infections: Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, and Proteus vulgaris. These bacteria are not alive in the vaccine. The treatment is given as a small spray under the tongue.

After the first treatment with apalutamide and hormone therapy, the study compares continued treatment with apalutamide plus docetaxel and hormone therapy. Treatment is given over time, with regular study visits and follow-up checks. During the study, doctors watch for changes in the cancer, possible side effects, and how long the treatment continues to work. The study is Phase III, which means it is a late-stage trial designed to better understand how well this treatment approach works and how safe it is.

Both medicines are given as a subcutaneous injection, which means an injection under the skin, once a week. People in the study receive one of several dose plans of NNC0487-0111 or semaglutide, and some study groups receive placebo. The study follows changes in body weight, blood sugar, waist size, blood pressure, and other health measures over time. It also looks at side effects, including low blood sugar, which can happen when blood sugar drops too far.

The study is planned to run for a long period, with treatment and follow-up visits spread across the study time. The medicines are given in a pre-filled pen, and the course of the study is designed to compare how the different treatments work and how safe they are in adults with excess body weight and type 2 diabetes.

Adults and adolescents in the study are assigned by chance to receive either GB-0895 or placebo, and neither the participants nor the study team knows which one is given during the study. Treatment is given over about 52 weeks, with regular study visits during that time. The study looks at how asthma changes over the year, including flare-ups, breathing, asthma symptoms, and daily life with asthma.

Some medical terms used in the study include exacerbations, which means asthma flare-ups that are bad enough to need steroid medicine or a hospital or emergency room visit, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), which is the amount of air that can be blown out in one second. The study also uses systemic corticosteroids, which are steroid medicines that work throughout the body.

The purpose of the study is to see whether oral semaglutide can help slow worsening of memory, thinking, and daily function in people with early Alzheimer’s disease, and to check its safety. The study is randomised, which means the treatment is assigned by chance, and double-blind, which means neither the participants nor the study team knows who receives semaglutide or placebo during the study. Treatment is taken by mouth over a long period, and the study follows changes over time.

Participants take the study tablets regularly and are seen at planned visits during the trial. These visits are used to monitor health, review how the person is doing, and record any changes in memory, daily activities, or side effects. The study compares how people do over time in the semaglutide and placebo groups.

The study is planned in two groups, and neither the participants nor the study team will know which treatment is given. After starting treatment, the medicine is taken for a period of time and then the study looks at changes in urine protein and kidney function over about 20 weeks. The study is designed to compare BI 764198 with placebo across the different kidney disease groups.

People in the study are assigned by chance to receive either inclisiran or placebo, and neither the participants nor the study team knows which one is given. The study follows participants over time while they receive the injections and are checked regularly for major heart-related problems such as myocardial infarction (heart attack), ischemic stroke (stroke caused by a blocked blood vessel), death from heart disease, or urgent procedures to open blocked heart arteries. The main purpose of the study is to find out whether inclisiran lowers the risk of these serious events better than placebo.

The study follows people who have already completed an earlier asciminib study and are considered by the doctor to still benefit from treatment. Treatment is continued over time, and regular study visits are planned so that health and any side effects can be watched. The study looks at possible adverse events, which are unwanted health problems that happen during treatment, and serious adverse events, which are more severe health problems. In some parts of the study, other tyrosine kinase inhibitors that may have been used in earlier studies include nilotinib, dasatinib, imatinib, and bosutinib.

The study is designed to provide continued access to the same study treatment received before while long-term safety is followed over time.

The purpose of the trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the new combination therapy. Over a period of about four weeks, subjects will take the study medication once daily, while other participants receive a matching placebo. Safety will be monitored through reports of any side effects, regular blood tests, standard 12‑lead ECG recordings to check heart rhythm, and measurements of Sweat chloride levels, which reflect how the disease is affecting the body.

Effectiveness will be assessed by measuring lung function using the percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (ppFEV1) and by having participants complete a disease‑specific questionnaire that evaluates breathing symptoms (CFQ R). The study involves several clinic visits for these tests and for overall health checks.