The purpose of the study is to understand how safe and tolerable the new treatment is for patients, as well as to see how well it works in reducing the size of the cancer. Participants in the study will receive the investigational treatment, and their response to the treatment will be monitored over time. The study will also look at how long any positive effects of the treatment last.

Throughout the study, researchers will keep track of any side effects experienced by participants and whether these side effects lead to stopping the treatment. The study aims to gather important information that could help in developing new treatment options for people with this type of cancer. The trial is expected to continue until early 2028.

The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of this stem cell treatment compared to a placebo. Participants in the study will receive an injection into their knee joint, either with the stem cell treatment or a placebo. The study will monitor knee symptoms and any side effects over a period of time to determine how well the treatment works and how safe it is for patients.

Throughout the study, participants will be asked to keep a diary of their knee pain and other symptoms. They will also undergo various assessments, including the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS) and MRI scans, to evaluate changes in their knee condition. The study aims to provide valuable insights into the potential benefits of using stem cells for treating knee osteoarthritis.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate how well AVP-786 works in reducing agitation symptoms in patients with Alzheimer’s-related dementia. Participants in the study will receive either the AVP-786 capsules or a placebo, and neither the participants nor the researchers will know which treatment each participant is receiving. This is known as a double-blind study. The study will take place over a period of time, during which participants will be monitored for changes in their symptoms and any side effects they may experience.

Throughout the study, participants will be asked to take the medication orally, in capsule form, and will be regularly assessed by healthcare professionals. The study aims to provide valuable information on whether AVP-786 can be a beneficial treatment option for managing agitation in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. The results will help determine if this medication can improve the quality of life for those affected by this condition.

The purpose of the study is to see how well Nemtabrutinib works compared to the other two treatments in people who have not yet received treatment for their CLL or SLL. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either Nemtabrutinib or one of the other two medications chosen by the study doctor. The study will last for a period of up to 108 weeks, during which participants will take the medication daily and attend regular check-ups to monitor their health and the progress of the disease.

Throughout the study, doctors will assess how the disease responds to the treatment and how long participants remain free from disease progression. They will also monitor overall survival and any side effects experienced by participants. The study aims to provide valuable information on the effectiveness and safety of Nemtabrutinib compared to the current standard treatments for CLL and SLL.

Participants in the study will be randomly assigned to receive either Upadacitinib or a placebo, which is a substance with no active medication. The study is designed to be double-blind, meaning neither the participants nor the researchers will know who is receiving the actual medication or the placebo. This helps ensure that the results are not influenced by expectations. The study will last for a period of time, during which participants will take the medication orally in the form of a modified-release tablet. The goal is to observe any changes in the severity of eczema symptoms and overall skin condition over the course of the study.

Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for any improvements in their eczema symptoms, such as reduced itching and inflammation, as well as any potential side effects. The study aims to provide valuable information on whether Upadacitinib can be an effective treatment option for those suffering from moderate to severe eczema. By participating in this study, researchers hope to gain insights that could lead to better management and treatment options for individuals with this challenging skin condition.

The purpose of the study is to find out if using targeted oxygen therapy can reduce the risk of death within 30 days compared to standard care. Participants in the study will receive one of the oxygen therapies, and some may also receive medications like Berodual (containing fenoterol hydrobromide and ipratropium bromide), Salbutamol, or Medicinal Oxygen to help with breathing. These treatments are given through inhalation, which means they are breathed in using a device called a nebulizer or as a compressed gas.

The study will follow participants over a period to monitor their health outcomes, such as survival rates at different time points, the length of hospital stays, and the need for additional breathing support like non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or mechanical ventilation. The goal is to improve the care and outcomes for patients with AECOPD by determining the most effective oxygen therapy approach.

The purpose of the study is to learn about the safety of BIIB080 and whether it can improve symptoms in participants. Participants will receive the treatment through an injection into the spinal fluid, a method known as intrathecal use. The study will last for a period of 76 weeks, during which participants will be monitored for changes in their cognitive abilities and overall health. The study aims to understand how different doses of the treatment affect the symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease.

Throughout the study, participants will undergo various assessments to track their progress. These assessments include tests to measure memory and thinking skills, as well as monitoring for any side effects or adverse events. The study is designed to provide valuable information on the potential benefits and safety of BIIB080 for individuals with early stages of Alzheimer’s disease.

Participants in the study will receive either secukinumab or a placebo. The study will last for 24 weeks, during which the effects of the treatment on shoulder symptoms will be monitored. The main focus will be on changes in physical symptoms related to the shoulder, assessed at different points throughout the study. Participants will be asked to continue any existing treatments, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and physiotherapy, at a stable dosage and regimen.

The study will also involve monitoring the safety and tolerability of secukinumab, including any side effects or changes in laboratory results. Participants will have their progress evaluated through various assessments, including the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). The study aims to provide valuable insights into the potential benefits of secukinumab for individuals with rotator cuff tendinopathy.

Participants in the study will receive either XTMAB-16 or a placebo, which looks like the treatment but does not contain the active ingredient. The study is divided into two parts. In the first part, the focus is on determining the safe dosage levels of XTMAB-16. In the second part, the study will assess how well XTMAB-16 works in reducing the use of corticosteroids. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for any side effects and changes in their condition.

The study aims to find out if XTMAB-16 can help patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis by allowing them to reduce their reliance on corticosteroids, which can have significant side effects when used long-term. The trial will also gather information on how the body processes XTMAB-16 and its impact on various health markers. This research could lead to new treatment options for those living with this condition.

The purpose of the study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of OATD-01 over a 12-week period. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either OATD-01 or a placebo, and neither the participants nor the researchers will know which treatment is being administered. Throughout the study, participants will undergo various assessments, including imaging tests like [18F]FDG PET/CT, to monitor changes in lung inflammation and overall health. The study aims to determine if OATD-01 can reduce the inflammation in the lungs and improve lung function and quality of life for those with active pulmonary sarcoidosis.

Participants will be closely monitored for any side effects or changes in their health during the study. The trial will also collect data on various health parameters, such as lung function tests and quality of life questionnaires, to evaluate the overall impact of the treatment. The study is expected to provide valuable insights into the potential benefits of OATD-01 for individuals with active pulmonary sarcoidosis.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate whether the new medicine can lower the number of treated bleeds compared with standard therapy. Participants will be assigned to receive either the new medicine or the standard factor VIII for about six months, attending regular visits where any bleeding events are recorded, quality‑of‑life questionnaires are completed, and safety checks such as blood tests for antibodies or reactions at the injection site are performed. The trial will monitor how often injections are needed, the amount of medicine used, and any side effects that arise during the treatment period.

The purpose of the trial is to determine whether NXT007 works at least as well as Emicizumab in preventing bleeds. Participants receive regular injections for several months and attend scheduled visits where doctors check their health, collect blood samples, and ask about daily activities and quality of life. The main way the study measures success is by counting the average number of bleeding episodes that need treatment each year, called the annualized number of treated bleeds.

Throughout the study, safety is closely watched. Researchers look for any side effects such as reactions at the injection site, allergic responses, or signs of clotting problems. Participants also complete simple questionnaires about how their condition affects everyday life, helping to assess both the medical and personal impact of the treatments.

People in the study are assigned by chance to receive either acetylcysteine or sodium chloride. The treatment is given during the hospital stay, and the study then follows the course of recovery over the next days and months. The study looks at how well participants do after treatment, including survival and length of hospital stay, without using complicated procedures in the description.

Sepsis is a serious reaction to infection that can quickly become life-threatening. Liver dysfunction means the liver is injured or not working normally. The purpose of this study is to assess whether acetylcysteine can help adults with severe infection and liver dysfunction recover better.

The study uses several cancer medicines, depending on the specific change found in the tumor. These include olaparib, erlotinib, crizotinib, trametinib, pemigatinib, selpercatinib, axitinib, vismodegib, pembrolizumab, larotrectinib, dabrafenib, and the injection Phesgo (trastuzumab and pertuzumab). Standard care medicines in the study include oxaliplatin, capecitabine, irinotecan, fluorouracil, calcium folinate, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel albumin-bound. Some medicines are taken by mouth, while others are given by injection or infusion into a vein.

During the study, people are assigned to receive either the tailored treatment or standard care. Treatment is given in repeated cycles, with regular medical visits to check health, side effects, and how the cancer is doing. The study follows people over time to see how long the cancer stays under control and how the treatments compare in safety and overall benefit.

People in the study will have either closed wounds, such as stitched cuts, or open wounds, such as small biopsy wounds made during the study. After treatment, the wounds will be followed over time while they heal, and the scars will be checked later. The study will also look at how safe the treatment is and whether any side effects occur, such as skin reactions or other body reactions. Some scars will also be looked at with medical pictures and ultrasound, which is a test that uses sound waves to create images inside the body.

Scar prevention is the main focus of this trial, and the study is designed to compare three verteporfin doses with saline in both open and closed wound types. The study will continue until the healing and scar checks are completed after treatment.

The study is for people whose cancer has gotten worse after treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD-1 therapy, which are treatments that help the immune system fight cancer. Treatment of physician’s choice may include topotecan, tisotumab vedotin, irinotecan, pemetrexed, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine, and some medicines may be given with supportive care such as paracetamol, H2-receptor antagonists, and glucocorticoids to help reduce side effects. The study is randomized, which means treatment is assigned by chance, and it is open-label, which means both the study team and the participant know which treatment is being given.

The study has an initial part and then a larger comparison part. In the first part, MK-2870 is given to gather early information about how it acts in the body and how well it is tolerated. In the main part, MK-2870 is compared with other available cancer treatments. Treatment is given over time, with regular study visits and checks for side effects and general health while the cancer is being followed.

The purpose of the study is to determine if niraparib can help patients live longer without the disease getting worse, compared to temozolomide. Participants in the study will be randomly assigned to receive either niraparib or temozolomide. The study will monitor the participants over time to see how the treatments affect their health and the progression of their glioblastoma.

Throughout the study, researchers will also look at how the treatments impact overall survival, which means the length of time patients live after starting the treatment. Additionally, the study will assess the participants’ symptoms, quality of life, and any side effects they may experience. This information will help determine the safety and effectiveness of niraparib compared to temozolomide for treating this specific type of glioblastoma.

The purpose of the study is to see whether oral semaglutide can help slow worsening of memory, thinking, and daily function in people with early Alzheimer’s disease, and to check its safety. The study is randomised, which means the treatment is assigned by chance, and double-blind, which means neither the participants nor the study team knows who receives semaglutide or placebo during the study. Treatment is taken by mouth over a long period, and the study follows changes over time.

Participants take the study tablets regularly and are seen at planned visits during the trial. These visits are used to monitor health, review how the person is doing, and record any changes in memory, daily activities, or side effects. The study compares how people do over time in the semaglutide and placebo groups.

The study is planned in two groups, and neither the participants nor the study team will know which treatment is given. After starting treatment, the medicine is taken for a period of time and then the study looks at changes in urine protein and kidney function over about 20 weeks. The study is designed to compare BI 764198 with placebo across the different kidney disease groups.

People in the study are assigned by chance to receive either inclisiran or placebo, and neither the participants nor the study team knows which one is given. The study follows participants over time while they receive the injections and are checked regularly for major heart-related problems such as myocardial infarction (heart attack), ischemic stroke (stroke caused by a blocked blood vessel), death from heart disease, or urgent procedures to open blocked heart arteries. The main purpose of the study is to find out whether inclisiran lowers the risk of these serious events better than placebo.

The study follows people who have already completed an earlier asciminib study and are considered by the doctor to still benefit from treatment. Treatment is continued over time, and regular study visits are planned so that health and any side effects can be watched. The study looks at possible adverse events, which are unwanted health problems that happen during treatment, and serious adverse events, which are more severe health problems. In some parts of the study, other tyrosine kinase inhibitors that may have been used in earlier studies include nilotinib, dasatinib, imatinib, and bosutinib.

The study is designed to provide continued access to the same study treatment received before while long-term safety is followed over time.