Participants will take the study drug by mouth every day for several months, with regular visits to check for any side effects and to answer simple questionnaires. Researchers will monitor for any new health problems, serious problems, and specific symptoms related to the study drugs. They will also use a few rating tools to watch for movement‑related side effects and to assess thoughts of self‑harm, using the C-SSRS questionnaire and movement scales called the SAS, BARS, and AIMS. The study ends after the treatment period and a short follow‑up to confirm the safety findings.

Both medicines are given as a subcutaneous injection, which means an injection under the skin, once a week. People in the study receive one of several dose plans of NNC0487-0111 or semaglutide, and some study groups receive placebo. The study follows changes in body weight, blood sugar, waist size, blood pressure, and other health measures over time. It also looks at side effects, including low blood sugar, which can happen when blood sugar drops too far.

The study is planned to run for a long period, with treatment and follow-up visits spread across the study time. The medicines are given in a pre-filled pen, and the course of the study is designed to compare how the different treatments work and how safe they are in adults with excess body weight and type 2 diabetes.

Adults and adolescents in the study are assigned by chance to receive either GB-0895 or placebo, and neither the participants nor the study team knows which one is given during the study. Treatment is given over about 52 weeks, with regular study visits during that time. The study looks at how asthma changes over the year, including flare-ups, breathing, asthma symptoms, and daily life with asthma.

Some medical terms used in the study include exacerbations, which means asthma flare-ups that are bad enough to need steroid medicine or a hospital or emergency room visit, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), which is the amount of air that can be blown out in one second. The study also uses systemic corticosteroids, which are steroid medicines that work throughout the body.

The study is planned in two groups, and neither the participants nor the study team will know which treatment is given. After starting treatment, the medicine is taken for a period of time and then the study looks at changes in urine protein and kidney function over about 20 weeks. The study is designed to compare BI 764198 with placebo across the different kidney disease groups.

People in the study are assigned by chance to receive either inclisiran or placebo, and neither the participants nor the study team knows which one is given. The study follows participants over time while they receive the injections and are checked regularly for major heart-related problems such as myocardial infarction (heart attack), ischemic stroke (stroke caused by a blocked blood vessel), death from heart disease, or urgent procedures to open blocked heart arteries. The main purpose of the study is to find out whether inclisiran lowers the risk of these serious events better than placebo.

The study follows people who have already completed an earlier asciminib study and are considered by the doctor to still benefit from treatment. Treatment is continued over time, and regular study visits are planned so that health and any side effects can be watched. The study looks at possible adverse events, which are unwanted health problems that happen during treatment, and serious adverse events, which are more severe health problems. In some parts of the study, other tyrosine kinase inhibitors that may have been used in earlier studies include nilotinib, dasatinib, imatinib, and bosutinib.

The study is designed to provide continued access to the same study treatment received before while long-term safety is followed over time.

The main purpose of this research is to determine if the combination of these three medications can help patients live longer compared to using docetaxel by itself. The study involves two groups of patients – one receiving all three medications, while the other group receives only docetaxel. The medications are given through different methods: tislelizumab and docetaxel are given through an intravenous infusion (into a vein), while N-803 is given as a subcutaneous injection (under the skin).

During the study, patients will receive treatment and have regular check-ups to monitor their health and how well the treatment is working. The treatment will continue as long as it appears to be helping and the side effects are manageable. Doctors will use special scanning techniques to measure if the tumors are shrinking and will track how long patients live after starting the treatment.

The study will likely begin with small groups of people receiving BMS-986525 by intravenous infusion, either by itself or with nivolumab. The treatment is given over time, and the study team watches for side effects and other changes while treatment continues. The purpose of the study is to find the best dose for further testing and to learn how the medicines behave in the body.

Relapsed means the cancer has returned after treatment, and refractory means it has not improved with treatment. Small Cell Lung Cancer is a fast-growing type of lung cancer. This study is focused on learning more about the safety of BMS-986525 with and without nivolumab in this disease.

The study is planned to last about 12 months for each person. It compares the two inhaled medicines in a random way, and the treatment is given through an inhaler. During the study, asthma symptoms and general control of asthma are checked at several visits, and the treatment is continued while these checks are done. The main purpose of the study is to see whether Trimbow works at least as well as Fostair for asthma control.

The study also looks at how often people have worse asthma attacks, how often they need steroid tablets by mouth, and whether breathing and quality of life change during the study. Safety is also watched throughout the treatment period.

People in the study are assigned to one of the two medicines. The treatment is given over time as intravenous infusions, which means medicine is put directly into a vein. The study is double-blind, which means the people taking part and the study doctors do not know which treatment is being given. During the study, doctors follow how the cancer changes, watch for side effects, and check how well each medicine is tolerated.

After the earlier treatment has finished, participants are assigned to receive either pumitamig or durvalumab. The study is randomized, which means the treatment is chosen by chance, and open-label, which means the treatment is known. The study team then follows the cancer over time and watches for changes, such as whether it stays stable, shrinks, or grows, and also checks how safe each medicine is and how well it is tolerated.

The study is designed for adults with newly diagnosed, low-risk disease. Treatment is given in phases over time, including an early treatment period and later treatment cycles called consolidation, which are used to help keep the disease under control after the first response. During the study, blood tests, heart checks, and other routine medical checks are done, and side effects are watched closely. The study also looks at how the body handles QTX-2101 and whether the leukemia goes away to a very deep level, meaning no clear signs of the cancer marker PML/RARA can be found in the bone marrow.

People in the study will receive either VMX-C001 or the usual care used for this situation. Some participants may also receive heparin, another blood-thinning medicine, if planned by the treating team. The study is designed to compare the two approaches during the procedure and shortly afterward, without changing the urgent care needed for the surgery or procedure.

The study is a Phase 3 trial, which means it is being done in a larger group of people to better understand how well the treatment works and how safe it is. People taking part are assigned by chance to receive either nipocalimab or placebo. The treatment is given over time, and the study team follows participants through the treatment period to observe how the disease changes.

The study lasts about 72 weeks. People in the study are placed into different groups by chance, and neither the participants nor the study team know who receives RO7795068 or placebo during the study. Before treatment starts, a first check is done. After that, the medicine is given regularly, and follow-up visits continue through the study period to monitor weight, blood sugar, and overall health.

The study also looks at changes related to HbA1c, a blood test that shows average blood sugar over time, as well as waist size, blood pressure, cholesterol, and possible side effects. It also checks how the treatment may affect daily physical function and quality of life.

The purpose of the study is to see if ziltivekimab works better than placebo in reducing the risk of serious heart-related problems in people who have both cardiovascular disease and kidney disease along with signs of inflammation in their body. The main focus is on preventing major cardiovascular events, which include death from heart-related causes, non-fatal heart attack, and non-fatal stroke. A heart attack occurs when blood flow to part of the heart muscle is blocked, while a stroke happens when blood flow to part of the brain is interrupted.

During the study, participants will receive either ziltivekimab or placebo through regular injections while continuing their standard medical treatment. The study will track various health outcomes over time, including heart attacks, strokes, heart-related deaths, hospital admissions for heart problems, and changes in kidney function. Researchers will also monitor changes in inflammation markers in the blood, heart function measurements, and overall health status. The study will measure how the kidneys are working by looking at blood test results that show the filtering ability of the kidneys and the amount of protein in the urine, which can indicate kidney damage.

The purpose of the study is to compare the effectiveness of a new medicine with that of standard chemotherapy. The investigational drug being tested is Sofetabart Mipitecan (LY4170156). For participants with platinum-resistant disease, the new drug may be given alone and compared with the doctor’s choice of chemotherapy drugs such as carboplatin, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, topotecan or doxorubicin, or with Mirvetuximab Soravtansine. For those with platinum-sensitive disease, the new drug is combined with bevacizumab and compared with a standard platinum‑based two‑drug chemotherapy regimen plus bevacizumab.

Participants receive the study medicines through an IV infusion every few weeks and attend regular clinic visits where doctors perform physical examinations and imaging scans to check how the cancer is responding. Treatment continues until the cancer grows, side effects become unacceptable, or the study period ends, which may be several months for each participant.

The purpose of the study is to compare how well the combination of zanzalintinib and pembrolizumab works against using pembrolizumab alone in treating this type of cancer. Participants in the study will be randomly assigned to receive either the combination treatment or pembrolizumab by itself. Some participants may receive a placebo, which looks like the real medication but does not contain the active drug. The study will involve regular check-ups and monitoring to assess the treatment’s effects and any side effects experienced by the participants.

The study will take place over several months, with participants receiving treatment and being monitored for changes in their condition. The goal is to determine if the combination of zanzalintinib and pembrolizumab can improve outcomes for patients with this type of cancer. Participants will be closely observed by medical professionals throughout the study to ensure their safety and to gather important data on the treatment’s effectiveness.

The purpose of this study is to determine if the combination of ceralasertib and durvalumab is more effective than docetaxel in treating patients with this type of lung cancer. Participants in the study will be randomly assigned to receive either the combination therapy or docetaxel. The study will monitor the overall survival of participants, which refers to the length of time patients live after starting the treatment. Other aspects being evaluated include how long the cancer stays under control, the quality of life reported by participants, and the safety and tolerability of the treatments.

The study will take place over a period of time, with participants receiving treatment for up to 24 months. During this time, participants will have regular check-ups and assessments to monitor their health and the progress of their cancer. The study aims to provide valuable information on the effectiveness and safety of these treatments for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.